6.5 sec in total
429 ms
4.9 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing SSIGMA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ssigma.in
Empower your industry with SSIGMA's cutting-edge Industrial automation courses, skill gap analysis, lab development & project consultancy
Visit ssigma.inWe analyzed Ssigma.in page load time and found that the first response time was 429 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ssigma.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value15.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.101
89/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
429 ms
1038 ms
205 ms
407 ms
566 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Ssigma.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ssigma.in.
Page size can be reduced by 359.1 kB (6%)
5.7 MB
5.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ssigma.in main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 165.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 165.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 192.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SSIGMA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 708 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 228 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ssigma.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (31%)
59
41
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SSIGMA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ssigma.in
429 ms
ssigma.in
1038 ms
style.css
205 ms
front.min.css
407 ms
sbttb-fonts.css
566 ms
smooth-back-to-top-button.css
564 ms
css
40 ms
css
53 ms
choices.min.css
585 ms
front.min.js
603 ms
jquery.min.js
807 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
620 ms
js
70 ms
smooth-back-to-top-button.js
750 ms
njt-whatsapp.js
938 ms
whatsapp-button.js
778 ms
scripts.min.js
1015 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
919 ms
jquery.mobile.js
938 ms
common.js
976 ms
gtm.js
104 ms
SSIGMA-512px-cropped.png
631 ms
1920p-SSIGMA-Home.jpg
997 ms
Industrial-Courses-by-SSIGMA.jpg
864 ms
Technical-Skill-Gap-Analysis.jpg
684 ms
Industrial-Services-by-SSIGMA.jpg
1123 ms
Lab-Development.jpg
790 ms
SSIGMA-Assignments-for-Educational.jpg
1052 ms
SSIGMA-Spcl-Industry-Services.jpg
874 ms
ssigma-industrial-projects.png
996 ms
1st-Course.jpg
1241 ms
2nd-Course.jpg
1259 ms
3rd-Course.jpg
1399 ms
4th-Course.jpg
1201 ms
5th-Course.jpg
1471 ms
SSIGMA-LP-Banner.jpg
1516 ms
ABB-Robot.png
1400 ms
CAM-Works.png
1428 ms
Hexagon.png
1446 ms
Sandvik.png
1599 ms
Skillsonics.jpg
1598 ms
MIQ.png
1612 ms
Sarla-Technologies.jpeg
1634 ms
2B2BB17F-DDB1-4716-BC65-3710871A1CD3_4_5005_c.jpeg
1680 ms
Bharat-Forge.jpg
1711 ms
SECO.png
1795 ms
Christiani.jpg
1801 ms
IFM.png
1818 ms
John-Deere.jpg
1823 ms
IMG_6996-removebg-preview.png
1889 ms
JSPM.jpg
1906 ms
E424F78C-A4AE-4159-B35C-F83B987DEC45_4_5005_c.jpeg
1906 ms
VIT_Bhopal_University_seal.svg_.png
1914 ms
font
25 ms
et-divi-dynamic-9-late.css
1900 ms
modules.woff
1992 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2020 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1981 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1579 ms
wpxpress.ttf
1543 ms
MGM-2.jpg
1420 ms
PVG.jpg
1347 ms
MIT-ADT.jpeg
1438 ms
pyrotek-pty-ltd-vector-logo.png
1306 ms
software-15.png
1397 ms
Creafinity-Logo-High-Res.png
1332 ms
style.min.css
206 ms
ssigma.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ssigma.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ssigma.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ssigma.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ssigma.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ssigma.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SSIGMA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: