1.6 sec in total
66 ms
1.3 sec
183 ms
Visit sslchecker.com now to see the best up-to-date SSL Checker content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sslchecker.com
Visit sslchecker.comWe analyzed Sslchecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
sslchecker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
66 ms
95 ms
307 ms
145 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Sslchecker.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (645 ms) belongs to the original domain Sslchecker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 274.9 kB (21%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Sslchecker.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SSL Checker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 153.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sslchecker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (15%)
41
35
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SSL Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sslchecker.com
66 ms
sslchecker.com
95 ms
www.sslchecker.com
307 ms
jquery.min.js
145 ms
jquery.yiiactiveform.js
95 ms
style.css
163 ms
sslchecker.css
50 ms
ZeroClipboard.js
49 ms
nivoslider.js
95 ms
jquery.main.js
167 ms
sslchecker.js
141 ms
ga.js
57 ms
modal-bg.png
31 ms
blue-link2.png
38 ms
repeats.png
30 ms
menu-active-arr.png
30 ms
line-red.gif
30 ms
modal-close.png
28 ms
header-bg.png
37 ms
logo.png
40 ms
line-white.gif
40 ms
icon-search.png
40 ms
slider_shadow.png
40 ms
1-sslcheckr.jpg
187 ms
blue6.png
52 ms
2-ssldec.jpg
236 ms
3-sslmatch.jpg
336 ms
4-csrdec.jpg
184 ms
5-csrgen.jpg
336 ms
6-idn.jpg
236 ms
7-insec.source.jpg
385 ms
8-approver.jpg
386 ms
9-selfsigned.jpg
486 ms
10-converter.jpg
485 ms
sprites.png
434 ms
btn-grey.png
435 ms
rarr-grey.png
436 ms
home_sprite.png
534 ms
rarr-white.png
489 ms
subscr-btn.png
487 ms
subscr-arr.png
488 ms
checkbox.png
534 ms
btn-small.png
583 ms
myriadpro-semibold-webfont.woff
633 ms
mp-regular-webfont.woff
535 ms
myriadpro-bold-webfont.woff
645 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
sslchecker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
sslchecker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sslchecker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document uses plugins
LA
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sslchecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latin is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sslchecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sslchecker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SSL Checker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: