5.3 sec in total
684 ms
4.1 sec
523 ms
Visit stadicam.ru now to see the best up-to-date Stadicam content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stadicam.ru
Мы занимаемся поставкой профессионального оборудования для видеооператоров, фотографов, режиссеров, телекомпаний и студий в любой уголок России
Visit stadicam.ruWe analyzed Stadicam.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 684 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
stadicam.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value8.1 s
20/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.619
10/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
684 ms
142 ms
263 ms
262 ms
264 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Stadicam.ru, 5% (5 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Pickpoint.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Stadicam.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 121.8 kB (19%)
625.3 kB
503.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Stadicam.ru main page is 625.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 252.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stadicam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stadicam.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (30%)
105
74
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stadicam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stadicam.ru
684 ms
style.css
142 ms
rekomend.css
263 ms
poisk.css
262 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
264 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
266 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
264 ms
jquery_slayder.js
292 ms
jquery_zoom.js
400 ms
jquery_all.js
422 ms
jquery_slayder2.js
403 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
jquery_rekomend.js
408 ms
jquery_rekomend2.js
453 ms
jquery_foto.js
454 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
jquery_poisk.js
538 ms
jquery_foto2.js
539 ms
jquery_podarok.js
548 ms
jquery_maska.js
564 ms
jquery_maske2.js
565 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
572 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
675 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
676 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
688 ms
postamat.js
724 ms
fon.jpg
380 ms
1.gif
144 ms
bg.jpg
139 ms
logo.png
260 ms
logo2.png
140 ms
bask.png
263 ms
ten.png
277 ms
punktir2.png
277 ms
punktir.png
289 ms
1.jpg
320 ms
2.jpg
381 ms
3.jpg
387 ms
4.jpg
397 ms
5.jpg
402 ms
6.jpg
414 ms
7.jpg
442 ms
8.jpg
505 ms
9.jpg
512 ms
10.jpg
520 ms
65b.jpg
526 ms
5b.jpg
545 ms
4b.jpg
563 ms
98b.jpg
627 ms
90b.jpg
644 ms
91b.jpg
643 ms
35b.jpg
649 ms
49b.jpg
670 ms
61b.jpg
684 ms
116b.jpg
750 ms
123b.jpg
765 ms
124b.jpg
770 ms
127b.jpg
772 ms
125b.jpg
799 ms
128b.jpg
806 ms
763b.jpg
873 ms
1045b.jpg
889 ms
rouble.ttf
1480 ms
1044b.jpg
760 ms
5426b.jpg
791 ms
5525b.jpg
738 ms
7852b.jpg
743 ms
1104b.jpg
755 ms
130b.jpg
748 ms
5891b.jpg
781 ms
150b.jpg
767 ms
5895b.jpg
1418 ms
140b.jpg
1359 ms
6208b.jpg
1477 ms
6330b.jpg
1230 ms
7011b.jpg
1466 ms
pic11.gif
1354 ms
8730s.jpg
1318 ms
punktir4.gif
1372 ms
8898s.jpg
1364 ms
8581s.jpg
1378 ms
punktir3.jpg
1382 ms
8584s.jpg
1463 ms
8722s.jpg
1449 ms
8711s.jpg
1400 ms
pic33.gif
1375 ms
8670s.jpg
1399 ms
8691s.jpg
1414 ms
8582s.jpg
1483 ms
211s.jpg
1494 ms
1414s.jpg
1428 ms
269s.jpg
1411 ms
220s.jpg
1418 ms
8688s.jpg
1437 ms
1397s.jpg
1493 ms
8765s.jpg
1509 ms
1599s.jpg
1442 ms
6297s.jpg
1425 ms
8470s.jpg
1436 ms
v1.png
1424 ms
y1.png
1505 ms
f1.png
1455 ms
arrowbg.png
1441 ms
radiobg.png
1436 ms
stadicam.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
stadicam.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
stadicam.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
RU
![]()
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stadicam.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stadicam.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
stadicam.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stadicam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: