1.4 sec in total
254 ms
918 ms
268 ms
Visit stargate.earth now to see the best up-to-date Stargate content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stargate.earth
There are countless timelines and agendas converging on this planet; Earth is a highly valuable piece of “real estate” to be fought over – for those that want to own it, yet won’t. Some came to experi...
Visit stargate.earthWe analyzed Stargate.earth page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
stargate.earth performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
254 ms
254 ms
92 ms
116 ms
120 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stargate.earth, 21% (9 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 16% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (254 ms) belongs to the original domain Stargate.earth.
Page size can be reduced by 64.5 kB (19%)
346.6 kB
282.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Stargate.earth main page is 346.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 161.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stargate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 747 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 164 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stargate.earth has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (65%)
34
12
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stargate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stargate.earth
254 ms
metatronsstargate.wordpress.com
254 ms
webfont.js
92 ms
116 ms
style.css
120 ms
126 ms
127 ms
126 ms
132 ms
css
135 ms
124 ms
128 ms
116 ms
hovercards.min.js
116 ms
wpgroho.js
128 ms
116 ms
smart.js
132 ms
115 ms
w.js
129 ms
css
57 ms
global-print.css
1 ms
conf
82 ms
ga.js
128 ms
flower-of-life-hexagonal-grid.jpg
198 ms
wpcom-mark.svg
73 ms
g.gif
154 ms
174 ms
cropped-stargate-above-earth1.jpg
228 ms
cropped-earth-hexagonal-grid-e1540046943899.jpg
174 ms
metatronsstargate.jpg
231 ms
g.gif
153 ms
g.gif
153 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
120 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
122 ms
4UaHrEJGsxNmFTPDnkaJ96Tp4Q.woff
122 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJPkqs.woff
135 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJPkqs.woff
122 ms
0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-MoFoqF2mg.woff
134 ms
0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-C0CoqF2mg.woff
134 ms
ata.js
108 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
actionbar.css
2 ms
actionbar.js
6 ms
stargate.earth accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stargate.earth best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
stargate.earth SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stargate.earth can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stargate.earth main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stargate.earth
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stargate. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: