2.4 sec in total
258 ms
1.5 sec
625 ms
Visit start.lu now to see the best up-to-date Start content for Luxembourg and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about start.lu
Start.lu as eng lëtzebuerger Startsäit mat Neiegkeeten, wichtegen Links zu allem waat een sou brauch an mat enger komfortabler Sich.
Visit start.luWe analyzed Start.lu page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
start.lu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value2.5 s
90/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
258 ms
484 ms
100 ms
197 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Start.lu, 31% (5 requests) were made to St.wetteronline.de and 6% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (498 ms) relates to the external source St.wetteronline.de.
Page size can be reduced by 44.2 kB (71%)
62.6 kB
18.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Start.lu main page is 62.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 49.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Start images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 971 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 536 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Start.lu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 536 B or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (36%)
14
9
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Start. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
start.lu
258 ms
start.lu
484 ms
default.css
100 ms
responsive.css
197 ms
urchin.js
44 ms
blau_h.gif
494 ms
www.wetteronline.de
344 ms
ellipsis.png
264 ms
corner.gif
260 ms
close.gif
373 ms
wetteronline_blue_114x22.png
498 ms
__utm.gif
61 ms
pc_city_hpweather.css
12 ms
adview
87 ms
bd____.png
42 ms
go.gif
4 ms
start.lu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
start.lu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
start.lu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
LB
LU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Start.lu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Start.lu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
start.lu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Start. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: