Tools & Wizards About Us
stauntondental.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

stauntondental.com

Dental Office of Dr. Caldieraro - Staunton, Illinois

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

736 ms

Page Rendered

641 ms

stauntondental.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Staunton Dental content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stauntondental.com

Welcome to the dental office of Dr. Caldieraro where we are committed to improving the health and aesthetics of your smile.

Visit stauntondental.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stauntondental.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stauntondental.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stauntondental.com

75 ms

caldierarodental.com

144 ms

style.css

28 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

55 ms

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stauntondental.com, 95% (53 requests) were made to Caldierarodental.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (358 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stauntondental.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 77.8 kB

  • Original 92.8 kB
  • After minification 89.1 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 708 B

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Staunton Dental images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 227 B

  • Original 132.1 kB
  • After minification 132.1 kB
  • After compression 131.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 73.6 kB
  • After minification 73.1 kB
  • After compression 57.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stauntondental.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (71%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staunton Dental. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stauntondental.com

stauntondental.com

75 ms

caldierarodental.com

caldierarodental.com

144 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

55 ms

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

67 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

76 ms

post-105.css

post-105.css

76 ms

custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css

custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css

83 ms

global.css

global.css

79 ms

post-157.css

post-157.css

82 ms

post-2729.css

post-2729.css

87 ms

post-122.css

post-122.css

103 ms

post-119.css

post-119.css

100 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

106 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

104 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

101 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

112 ms

custom-pro-widget-nav-menu.min.css

custom-pro-widget-nav-menu.min.css

121 ms

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

122 ms

custom-pro-widget-call-to-action.min.css

custom-pro-widget-call-to-action.min.css

123 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

123 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

135 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

142 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

139 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

153 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

154 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

154 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

163 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

161 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

163 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

176 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

171 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

176 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

190 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

190 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

191 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

196 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

202 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

180 ms

embed

embed

358 ms

about.jpg

about.jpg

247 ms

wall.jpg

wall.jpg

238 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

184 ms

porcelain_veneers.jpg

porcelain_veneers.jpg

163 ms

implants.jpg

implants.jpg

162 ms

porcelain_crowns.jpg

porcelain_crowns.jpg

185 ms

wisdom_teeth.jpg

wisdom_teeth.jpg

224 ms

bridges.jpg

bridges.jpg

202 ms

smile-gallery-hero-pic-1.jpg

smile-gallery-hero-pic-1.jpg

182 ms

braces.jpg

braces.jpg

243 ms

clear-aligners.jpg

clear-aligners.jpg

213 ms

placeholder.png

placeholder.png

211 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

51 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

57 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

77 ms

js

js

37 ms

Accessibility Review

stauntondental.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stauntondental.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stauntondental.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stauntondental.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stauntondental.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stauntondental.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Staunton Dental. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: