Tools & Wizards About Us
staxofax.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

staxofax.com

啪啪无码人妻丰满熟妇-青春娱乐网97超碰人人射-久久久精品波多野结衣AV-熟妇人妻中文字幕

Page Load Speed

593 ms in total

First Response

169 ms

Resources Loaded

279 ms

Page Rendered

145 ms

staxofax.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to staxofax.com homepage info - get ready to check Staxofax best content right away, or after learning these important things about staxofax.com

啪啪无码人妻丰满熟妇,青春娱乐网97超碰人人射,久久久精品波多野结衣AV,熟妇人妻中文字幕,久久精品亚洲AV三区麻豆,被公疯狂玩弄的年轻人妻,黑人粗大无码AV人妻一区

Visit staxofax.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Staxofax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 424 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staxofax.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

staxofax.com

169 ms

addthis_widget.js

12 ms

screenshot.jpg

108 ms

FindMySoft.jpg

84 ms

300lo.json

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Staxofax.com, 44% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 11% (1 request) were made to M.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (169 ms) belongs to the original domain Staxofax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.4 kB (60%)

Content Size

510.5 kB

After Optimization

206.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Staxofax.com main page is 510.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 399.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

  • Original 57.4 kB
  • After minification 56.3 kB
  • After compression 18.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 53.6 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Staxofax needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 259.1 kB

  • Original 399.5 kB
  • After minification 399.5 kB
  • After compression 140.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 259.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staxofax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

staxofax.com

staxofax.com

169 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

12 ms

screenshot.jpg

screenshot.jpg

108 ms

FindMySoft.jpg

FindMySoft.jpg

84 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

30 ms

273.33dc1e6c32820cabb584.js

273.33dc1e6c32820cabb584.js

9 ms

counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js

counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js

4 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

21 ms

shares.json

shares.json

18 ms

SEO Factors

staxofax.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staxofax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Staxofax.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

staxofax.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Staxofax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: