2.1 sec in total
469 ms
1.5 sec
143 ms
Click here to check amazing Stehlampe content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stehlampe.org
Hier finden Sie für sämtliche Stehlampen die passenden Angebote und Informationen. Darunter auch außergewöhnliche Formen, Materialien und Designs.
Visit stehlampe.orgWe analyzed Stehlampe.org page load time and found that the first response time was 469 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
stehlampe.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
469 ms
570 ms
380 ms
283 ms
404 ms
Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Stehlampe.org, 22% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (570 ms) belongs to the original domain Stehlampe.org.
Page size can be reduced by 194.0 kB (66%)
294.9 kB
100.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Stehlampe.org main page is 294.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 149.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 741 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stehlampe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 88.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stehlampe.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
7
7
The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stehlampe. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
stehlampe.org
469 ms
www.stehlampe.org
570 ms
bootstrap.min.css
380 ms
css_stehlampe.css
283 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
404 ms
bootstrap.min.js
259 ms
stehlampe.jpg
376 ms
ga.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
stehlampe.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stehlampe.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stehlampe.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stehlampe.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stehlampe.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
stehlampe.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stehlampe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: