2.3 sec in total
419 ms
1.8 sec
120 ms
Visit sterlingcoleman.com now to see the best up-to-date Sterling Coleman content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sterlingcoleman.com
A space for my personal projects and thoughts
Visit sterlingcoleman.comWe analyzed Sterlingcoleman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 419 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sterlingcoleman.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
419 ms
311 ms
444 ms
256 ms
253 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Sterlingcoleman.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Sterlingcoleman.com.
Page size can be reduced by 390.7 kB (73%)
537.4 kB
146.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Sterlingcoleman.com main page is 537.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 256.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sterling Coleman needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 174.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 197.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sterlingcoleman.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 197.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (61%)
31
12
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sterling Coleman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sterlingcoleman.com
419 ms
k2.css
311 ms
bootstrap.min.css
444 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
256 ms
font-awesome.css
253 ms
mobile-menu.css
129 ms
template.css
318 ms
preset1.css
256 ms
template.css
317 ms
mootools-core.js
520 ms
core.js
325 ms
jquery.min.js
567 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
388 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
391 ms
k2.js
462 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
452 ms
bootstrap.min.js
517 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
512 ms
helix.core.js
512 ms
menu.js
601 ms
SterlingColemanLogo.jpg
85 ms
en_us.gif
75 ms
fr_fr.gif
81 ms
MiriamEN.png
82 ms
2012EasternContinentalTrailSlide.jpg
302 ms
all.js
160 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
320 ms
59 ms
xd_arbiter.php
159 ms
xd_arbiter.php
289 ms
like.php
77 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
292 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
326 ms
sterlingcoleman.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sterlingcoleman.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sterlingcoleman.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sterlingcoleman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sterlingcoleman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sterlingcoleman.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sterling Coleman. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: