8.5 sec in total
1.7 sec
6.6 sec
269 ms
Visit stetig.com now to see the best up-to-date Stetig content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stetig.com
Buy the domain name Stetig.com and launch your business with a premium domain and a high quality logo.
Visit stetig.comWe analyzed Stetig.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
stetig.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
1718 ms
2030 ms
80 ms
204 ms
338 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Stetig.com, 30% (24 requests) were made to Brandbucket.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Stetig.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (60%)
2.5 MB
986.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Stetig.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stetig images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 342.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stetig.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 342.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (56%)
73
32
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stetig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stetig.com
1718 ms
www.stetig.com
2030 ms
minify.css
80 ms
jquery.min.js
204 ms
minify.js
338 ms
62 ms
api.js
59 ms
pace.min.js
147 ms
smart_header.js
148 ms
smooth_scroll.js
157 ms
smart_header.css
156 ms
analytics.js
678 ms
fbds.js
679 ms
recaptcha__en.js
853 ms
smartheader_scroll.png
672 ms
full_logo_black.png
903 ms
xlarge_stetig.png
1219 ms
smart_load.png
671 ms
score_card_delim.png
666 ms
maintheme_screen.png
833 ms
maintheme_screen_over.png
669 ms
iframe_api
833 ms
smart_whatbox1.png
928 ms
smart_whatbox2.png
918 ms
smart_whatbox3.png
918 ms
smart_logo1.png
920 ms
smart_logo2.png
957 ms
smart_logo3.png
929 ms
smart_logo4.png
931 ms
smart_logo5.png
932 ms
icon_social_facebook.png
932 ms
icon_social_twitter.png
948 ms
icon_social_pinterest.png
932 ms
icon_social_tumblr.png
954 ms
icon_social_google_plus.png
954 ms
icon_social_linkedin.png
946 ms
1723160.js
639 ms
stetig
1305 ms
loading1.gif
171 ms
channel.html
66 ms
collect
111 ms
196 ms
visit
123 ms
visit
134 ms
66 ms
www-widgetapi.js
170 ms
collect
178 ms
BfqG0L7vha0
78 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
43 ms
www-embed-player.js
88 ms
base.js
185 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
137 ms
ad_status.js
97 ms
cloudflare.min.js
46 ms
minify.css
88 ms
jquery.min.js
16 ms
minify.js
547 ms
api.js
139 ms
smart_header.css
78 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
137 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
156 ms
analytics.js
160 ms
fbds.js
160 ms
ga.js
121 ms
loading1.gif
42 ms
dropselect.png
19 ms
channel.html
23 ms
anchor
54 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
styles__ltr.css
35 ms
collect
57 ms
22 ms
collect
18 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
13 ms
webworker.js
117 ms
logo_48.png
67 ms
collect
65 ms
48 ms
nice_bk2.jpg
17 ms
21 ms
stetig.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stetig.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
stetig.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stetig.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stetig.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stetig.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stetig. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: