Tools & Wizards About Us
stevethedecorator.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

stevethedecorator.com

Quality Painter and Decorator for Cambridge

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

2.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

326 ms

stevethedecorator.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stevethe Decorator content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stevethedecorator.com

steve the Painter & Decorator Quality Painters & Decorators for cambridge. Near 40 years experience, latest paint trends, free estimates.

Visit stevethedecorator.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stevethedecorator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stevethedecorator.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stevethedecorator.co.uk

2514 ms

446 ms

grid.css

120 ms

style.css

251 ms

camera.css

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Stevethedecorator.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Stevethedecorator.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 266.1 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

825.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stevethedecorator.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 930.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 208.0 kB

  • Original 930.0 kB
  • After minification 722.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stevethe Decorator needs image optimization as it can save up to 208.0 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 119.9 kB
  • After minification 119.1 kB
  • After compression 86.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stevethedecorator.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (59%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stevethe Decorator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stevethedecorator.co.uk

stevethedecorator.co.uk

2514 ms

446 ms

grid.css

grid.css

120 ms

style.css

style.css

251 ms

camera.css

camera.css

350 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

350 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

530 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

357 ms

camera.js

camera.js

466 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

396 ms

wow.js

wow.js

489 ms

script.js

script.js

488 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

510 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

27 ms

animate.css

animate.css

302 ms

touchTouch.css

touchTouch.css

354 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

55 ms

bg_pattern1.png

bg_pattern1.png

164 ms

ga.js

ga.js

41 ms

Painters%20and%20Decorators%20Cambridge.png

Painters%20and%20Decorators%20Cambridge.png

438 ms

page1_pic1.jpg

page1_pic1.jpg

271 ms

hline.png

hline.png

160 ms

conservatory.jpg

conservatory.jpg

533 ms

kitchenx.jpg

kitchenx.jpg

191 ms

zoom_icon.png

zoom_icon.png

285 ms

house%202.jpg

house%202.jpg

418 ms

bg_pattern2.png

bg_pattern2.png

334 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

382 ms

jquery.equalheights.js

jquery.equalheights.js

387 ms

device.min.js

device.min.js

431 ms

tmstickup.js

tmstickup.js

513 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

506 ms

touchTouch.jquery.js

touchTouch.jquery.js

530 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

526 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

547 ms

jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js

jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js

640 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

636 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

641 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

27 ms

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

33 ms

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYkqUcKWmT.ttf

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYkqUcKWmT.ttf

39 ms

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYdaIcKWmT.ttf

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYdaIcKWmT.ttf

45 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

20 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

camera-loader.gif

camera-loader.gif

149 ms

Smooth%20Walls%20and%20Woodwork.jpg

Smooth%20Walls%20and%20Woodwork.jpg

366 ms

bg_transparent.png

bg_transparent.png

152 ms

owl_prev_btn.png

owl_prev_btn.png

150 ms

owl_next_btn.png

owl_next_btn.png

150 ms

Paint%20Charts.jpg

Paint%20Charts.jpg

807 ms

Accessibility Review

stevethedecorator.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stevethedecorator.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stevethedecorator.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stevethedecorator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stevethedecorator.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stevethedecorator.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stevethe Decorator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: