Tools & Wizards About Us
sticard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

sticard.com

Impresoras de tarjetas plásticas, control de accesos y horario

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

741 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

259 ms

sticard.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sticard.com now to see the best up-to-date Sticard content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sticard.com

Impresoras de tarjetas (Evolis, Fargo, Datacard). Especialistas en tarjeta plástica y personalización de tarjetas. Terminales Virdi para control de accesos.

Visit sticard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sticard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 741 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sticard.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,610 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sticard.com

741 ms

webfont.js

43 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

flick.css

273 ms

www.sticard.com

567 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Sticard.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sticard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 583.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sticard.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 127.0 kB

  • Original 151.0 kB
  • After minification 145.6 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 91.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sticard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 350.8 kB

  • Original 772.7 kB
  • After minification 772.7 kB
  • After compression 421.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 350.8 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 132.0 kB
  • After minification 132.0 kB
  • After compression 118.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sticard.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (57%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sticard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sticard.com

www.sticard.com

741 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

43 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

flick.css

flick.css

273 ms

www.sticard.com

www.sticard.com

567 ms

styles.css

styles.css

314 ms

settings.css

settings.css

324 ms

style.css

style.css

310 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

530 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

385 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

413 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

551 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

427 ms

scrollTo.js

scrollTo.js

488 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

518 ms

mailchimp.js

mailchimp.js

550 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

593 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

725 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

646 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

749 ms

9f71b7bb83.js

9f71b7bb83.js

58 ms

js

js

78 ms

vc_carousel.min.css

vc_carousel.min.css

581 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

608 ms

api.js

api.js

140 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

635 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

689 ms

waypoints-sticky.min.js

waypoints-sticky.min.js

691 ms

prettyPhoto.js

prettyPhoto.js

713 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

743 ms

functions.js

functions.js

774 ms

flexslider.min.js

flexslider.min.js

794 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

801 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

796 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

815 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

846 ms

transition.min.js

transition.min.js

878 ms

vc_carousel.min.js

vc_carousel.min.js

898 ms

style.css

style.css

660 ms

73d3392df5b5366406face9a2.js

73d3392df5b5366406face9a2.js

277 ms

choice.js

choice.js

92 ms

logo-sti.png

logo-sti.png

258 ms

logo-retina.png

logo-retina.png

262 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

261 ms

sentry-interactive-control-accesos-movil-sin-lectores.jpg

sentry-interactive-control-accesos-movil-sin-lectores.jpg

355 ms

tbs-biometria-sin-contacto.jpg

tbs-biometria-sin-contacto.jpg

260 ms

evolis-agilia-slide.png

evolis-agilia-slide.png

565 ms

impresora-de-tarjetas-evolis-primacy-2.png

impresora-de-tarjetas-evolis-primacy-2.png

260 ms

catalogo-identificaci%C3%B3n-e-impresoras-de-tarjetas-sti-card-2022.jpg

catalogo-identificaci%C3%B3n-e-impresoras-de-tarjetas-sti-card-2022.jpg

1132 ms

x-face-virdi-1.jpg

x-face-virdi-1.jpg

364 ms

VIRUS-PARAMOS-UNIDOS.jpg

VIRUS-PARAMOS-UNIDOS.jpg

664 ms

slide-biometria-2020.jpg

slide-biometria-2020.jpg

369 ms

nuevos-terminales-virdi.png

nuevos-terminales-virdi.png

758 ms

gestion-jornada-laboral.png

gestion-jornada-laboral.png

576 ms

evolis-primacy-2.jpg

evolis-primacy-2.jpg

576 ms

bg_slidedemo.jpg

bg_slidedemo.jpg

865 ms

retransferencia_impresoras.jpg

retransferencia_impresoras.jpg

777 ms

soft-identificacion-2.jpg

soft-identificacion-2.jpg

684 ms

photo_impresora_home1.png

photo_impresora_home1.png

905 ms

photo_fab_tarjetas.jpg

photo_fab_tarjetas.jpg

818 ms

photo_acceso_home.png

photo_acceso_home.png

790 ms

photo_software.jpg

photo_software.jpg

810 ms

photo_accesorios.jpg

photo_accesorios.jpg

904 ms

photo_soporte.jpg

photo_soporte.jpg

905 ms

logo_virdi.png

logo_virdi.png

915 ms

logo_fargo.png

logo_fargo.png

922 ms

logo_evolis-new.png

logo_evolis-new.png

1021 ms

logo_matica.png

logo_matica.png

1009 ms

logo_cim.png

logo_cim.png

1012 ms

logo-entrust.png

logo-entrust.png

1020 ms

logo_cmi_tech.jpg

logo_cmi_tech.jpg

1032 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1117 ms

be.js

be.js

244 ms

v2.zopim.com

v2.zopim.com

184 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

172 ms

asset_composer.js

asset_composer.js

79 ms

anchor

anchor

38 ms

c3po.jpg

c3po.jpg

163 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

5 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

12 ms

8NY0ran000JGuwjjrnGZuyoBb1n1tpfvDqq-fwWafx0.js

8NY0ran000JGuwjjrnGZuyoBb1n1tpfvDqq-fwWafx0.js

49 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

46 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

33 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

82 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

83 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

85 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

69 ms

Accessibility Review

sticard.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sticard.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sticard.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sticard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sticard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sticard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sticard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: