Tools & Wizards About Us
stocktaker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

stocktaker.com

Stocktakers and Stocktake Services | Stocktaking by Countability UK

Page Load Speed

908 ms in total

First Response

67 ms

Resources Loaded

767 ms

Page Rendered

74 ms

stocktaker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit stocktaker.com now to see the best up-to-date Stocktake R content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stocktaker.com

Looking for reliable Stocktakers in the UK and Europe? Look no further than Countability UK Ltd. Call for a Free quote and 10% Discount if booked online.

Visit stocktaker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stocktaker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 841 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stocktaker.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.756

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.stocktaker.com

67 ms

grids.css

48 ms

hcaptcha.css

50 ms

user-style.css

40 ms

sitestyle.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Stocktaker.com, 38% (9 requests) were made to Site-assets.cdnmns.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (415 ms) relates to the external source Css-fonts.eu.extra-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.3 kB (16%)

Content Size

151.0 kB

After Optimization

126.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stocktaker.com main page is 151.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 111.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 29.3 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stocktake R images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 172 B

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 8.3 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 605 B

  • Original 111.5 kB
  • After minification 111.5 kB
  • After compression 110.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stocktaker.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stocktake R. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.stocktaker.com

www.stocktaker.com

67 ms

grids.css

grids.css

48 ms

hcaptcha.css

hcaptcha.css

50 ms

user-style.css

user-style.css

40 ms

sitestyle.css

sitestyle.css

66 ms

external-libs.css

external-libs.css

54 ms

loader-polyfills.js

loader-polyfills.js

67 ms

loader.js

loader.js

68 ms

js

js

68 ms

css

css

30 ms

external-libs.css

external-libs.css

40 ms

css

css

415 ms

Bottom_texture.jpg

Bottom_texture.jpg

25 ms

email-bg-1.jpg

email-bg-1.jpg

21 ms

tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvLFG6rXmq.woff

tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvLFG6rXmq.woff

68 ms

tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvy1a6rXmq.woff

tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvy1a6rXmq.woff

69 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

27 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

28 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

29 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

28 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

28 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

68 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

110 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

135 ms

Accessibility Review

stocktaker.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stocktaker.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stocktaker.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stocktaker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stocktaker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stocktaker.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stocktake R. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: