Tools & Wizards About Us
stonebond.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

stonebond.com

Stone Bond Technologies | Advanced Data Integration Platform Solution

Page Load Speed

18.1 sec in total

First Response

2.4 sec

Resources Loaded

11.7 sec

Page Rendered

4 sec

stonebond.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stonebond.com homepage info - get ready to check Stone Bond best content right away, or after learning these important things about stonebond.com

Stone Bond's Enterprise Enabler® is an advanced data integration single platform; leading the way with Data Virtualization & Agile ETL by unifying information silos and scattered data for visibil...

Visit stonebond.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonebond.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 15.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stonebond.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.561

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stonebond.com

2431 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

371 ms

layerslider.css

329 ms

layerslider.custom.css

367 ms

css

327 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Stonebond.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Stonebond.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (78%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

441.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stonebond.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 73.4 kB

  • Original 90.9 kB
  • After minification 88.8 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 538.7 kB

  • Original 830.7 kB
  • After minification 828.7 kB
  • After compression 292.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 538.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 930.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 132.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonebond.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 930.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (72%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stone Bond. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stonebond.com

stonebond.com

2431 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

371 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

329 ms

layerslider.custom.css

layerslider.custom.css

367 ms

css

css

327 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

367 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

735 ms

pe-line-icons.min.css

pe-line-icons.min.css

1511 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

604 ms

icomoon-fonts.min.css

icomoon-fonts.min.css

1586 ms

theme-icons.min.css

theme-icons.min.css

1620 ms

css

css

1491 ms

style.css

style.css

1621 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1689 ms

icon-manager.css

icon-manager.css

1670 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

1670 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1759 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1757 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1715 ms

jquery.queryloader2.js

jquery.queryloader2.js

1715 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

1716 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

3158 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

3158 ms

css

css

1552 ms

vc_carousel.min.css

vc_carousel.min.css

3736 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

3590 ms

anti-spam-4.3.js

anti-spam-4.3.js

3590 ms

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

3589 ms

jquery.rwdImageMaps.min.js

jquery.rwdImageMaps.min.js

3754 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

3754 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

3753 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

3753 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

3715 ms

wp-a11y.min.js

wp-a11y.min.js

3714 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

3714 ms

vendors-ck.js

vendors-ck.js

4114 ms

scripts-ck.js

scripts-ck.js

3720 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

3713 ms

jquerytransit.js

jquerytransit.js

3715 ms

api.js

api.js

3679 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

3714 ms

transition.min.js

transition.min.js

3713 ms

vc_carousel.min.js

vc_carousel.min.js

4073 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1562 ms

ss.js

ss.js

780 ms

Stone-Bond-Website-Logov3.jpg

Stone-Bond-Website-Logov3.jpg

673 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

656 ms

social-150x150.png

social-150x150.png

656 ms

Infuse2-150x150.png

Infuse2-150x150.png

655 ms

one-view-150x150.png

one-view-150x150.png

673 ms

CenterPoint.png

CenterPoint.png

673 ms

HP-1-e1465330520284.png

HP-1-e1465330520284.png

673 ms

GE.png

GE.png

622 ms

Fisher.png

Fisher.png

622 ms

Huber.png

Huber.png

698 ms

PDVSA.png

PDVSA.png

696 ms

Enervest_170x200.jpg

Enervest_170x200.jpg

696 ms

WCA-Logo.png

WCA-Logo.png

697 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

347 ms

theme-icons.woff

theme-icons.woff

261 ms

collect

collect

1078 ms

collect

collect

2096 ms

net

net

2095 ms

ga.js

ga.js

544 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

1040 ms

sf14g.js

sf14g.js

1767 ms

skin.css

skin.css

1488 ms

Accessibility Review

stonebond.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stonebond.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stonebond.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonebond.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonebond.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stonebond.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stone Bond. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: