1 sec in total
78 ms
803 ms
161 ms
Click here to check amazing Stonebranch content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonebranch.com
Hybrid IT automation software platform for workflow orchestration of IT tasks, jobs and workloads across both on-prem and cloud environments.
Visit stonebranch.comWe analyzed Stonebranch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 964 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
stonebranch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value3,570 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.7 s
2/100
10%
78 ms
114 ms
21 ms
25 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Stonebranch.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (325 ms) belongs to the original domain Stonebranch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (73%)
2.0 MB
545.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Stonebranch.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonebranch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 747.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 747.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 662.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonebranch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 662.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (69%)
64
20
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonebranch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stonebranch.com
78 ms
www.stonebranch.com
114 ms
autodemo.js
21 ms
css
25 ms
bootstrap.css
118 ms
font-awesome.css
60 ms
simple-line-icons.css
41 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
44 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
43 ms
magnific-popup.css
41 ms
theme.css
125 ms
theme-elements.css
151 ms
theme-blog.css
62 ms
theme-shop.css
63 ms
theme-animate.css
99 ms
settings.css
105 ms
layers.css
141 ms
navigation.css
145 ms
component.css
130 ms
default.css
160 ms
custom.css
138 ms
modernizr.js
159 ms
jquery.js
220 ms
jquery.appear.js
217 ms
jquery.easing.js
217 ms
jquery-cookie.js
217 ms
bootstrap.js
246 ms
common.js
218 ms
jquery.validation.js
234 ms
jquery.stellar.js
231 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.js
231 ms
jquery.gmap.js
232 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
233 ms
jquery.isotope.js
244 ms
owl.carousel.js
323 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
319 ms
vide.js
320 ms
theme.js
323 ms
counter.js
7 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
325 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
314 ms
jquery.flipshow.js
290 ms
view.home.js
290 ms
theme.init.js
289 ms
jquery.js
275 ms
gtm.js
146 ms
logo.png
129 ms
coop.png
130 ms
unitedsupermarkets.png
131 ms
csc.png
132 ms
firstontario.png
132 ms
lvm.png
133 ms
guideone.png
133 ms
epo.png
134 ms
jndata.png
134 ms
nissan.png
134 ms
johnsonandjohnson.png
135 ms
bayer.png
136 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
108 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
109 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
110 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
109 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
109 ms
orbitz.png
123 ms
neimanmarcus.png
170 ms
gad.png
171 ms
logo-footer.png
171 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
90 ms
clhLqOv7MXn459PTh0gXYHW1xglZCgocDnD_teV2lMU.woff
23 ms
analytics.js
122 ms
t.php
64 ms
loader0.js
80 ms
stonebranch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
stonebranch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
stonebranch.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonebranch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stonebranch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonebranch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stonebranch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: