Tools & Wizards About Us
stonehengedesigns.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

stonehengedesigns.co.in

Stonehenge Designs is an Interior design studio in Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Page Load Speed

23.4 sec in total

First Response

270 ms

Resources Loaded

23.1 sec

Page Rendered

65 ms

stonehengedesigns.co.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stonehenge Designs content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonehengedesigns.co.in

Stonehenge Designs is a team of young and dynamic interior architects, engineers and professionals. The objective of our design is to enhance user experience in space. Post overall ideation, our team ...

Visit stonehengedesigns.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonehengedesigns.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 23.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

stonehengedesigns.co.in performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.stonehengedesigns.co.in

270 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

40 ms

minified.js

40 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

101 ms

polyfill.min.js

20092 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stonehengedesigns.co.in, 49% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 34% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 389.9 kB (42%)

Content Size

936.1 kB

After Optimization

546.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Stonehengedesigns.co.in main page is 936.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 428.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 328.8 kB

  • Original 428.0 kB
  • After minification 426.5 kB
  • After compression 99.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 328.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 230.8 kB
  • After minification 229.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonehenge Designs images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 59.4 kB

  • Original 277.3 kB
  • After minification 277.3 kB
  • After compression 217.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonehenge Designs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.stonehengedesigns.co.in

www.stonehengedesigns.co.in

270 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

40 ms

minified.js

minified.js

40 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

101 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

20092 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

85 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

85 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

83 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

85 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

90 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

85 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

87 ms

logo%20website.png

logo%20website.png

219 ms

_DSC2021%20copy.jpg

_DSC2021%20copy.jpg

2611 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

86 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

53 ms

64 ms

18 ms

20 ms

21 ms

24 ms

24 ms

64 ms

66 ms

68 ms

68 ms

66 ms

112 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

8 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

31 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

22 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

6 ms

Accessibility Review

stonehengedesigns.co.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

stonehengedesigns.co.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stonehengedesigns.co.in SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonehengedesigns.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonehengedesigns.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stonehengedesigns.co.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonehenge Designs. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: