2 sec in total
57 ms
1.2 sec
773 ms
Visit stonesiegel.com now to see the best up-to-date Stone Siegel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonesiegel.com
Stone • Siegel Law Firm is a leader. in real estate litigation in Santa Cruz. Contact us today about your legal matter at 831-768-9110.
Visit stonesiegel.comWe analyzed Stonesiegel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
stonesiegel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value4.5 s
71/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
57 ms
71 ms
107 ms
74 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Stonesiegel.com, 15% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (507 ms) belongs to the original domain Stonesiegel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 199.8 kB (10%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Stonesiegel.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stone Siegel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonesiegel.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (69%)
84
26
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stone Siegel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stonesiegel.com
57 ms
www.stonesiegel.com
71 ms
www.stonesiegel.com
107 ms
basic.min.css
74 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
132 ms
theme.min.css
104 ms
theme.min.css
90 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
85 ms
general.min.css
105 ms
eael-61.css
125 ms
style.min.css
162 ms
header-footer.min.css
172 ms
post-5.css
175 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
195 ms
swiper.min.css
194 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
210 ms
post-9.css
234 ms
post-7.css
242 ms
post-61.css
242 ms
css
33 ms
fontawesome.min.css
263 ms
solid.min.css
211 ms
jquery.min.js
290 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
285 ms
jquery.json.min.js
269 ms
gravityforms.min.js
331 ms
utils.min.js
332 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
337 ms
widget-flip-box.min.css
340 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
327 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
328 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
419 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
331 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
422 ms
dom-ready.min.js
507 ms
hooks.min.js
335 ms
i18n.min.js
419 ms
a11y.min.js
420 ms
swap.js
40 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
435 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
440 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
427 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
425 ms
general.min.js
411 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
501 ms
premium-wrapper-link.min.js
506 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
495 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
393 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
383 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
381 ms
frontend.min.js
429 ms
waypoints.min.js
424 ms
core.min.js
409 ms
frontend.min.js
409 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
386 ms
gtm.js
132 ms
logo_updated_300px.png
355 ms
seagull_on_rock.png
308 ms
1.jpg
363 ms
Dots-1.png
386 ms
stone_seagull.png
380 ms
3.jpg
374 ms
AdobeStock_177733208_Preview.png
364 ms
1-2.png
355 ms
2-2.png
420 ms
3-2.png
368 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf
105 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDypqaE0lP.ttf
160 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDppqaE0lP.ttf
195 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJqaE0lP.ttf
182 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDJp2aE0lP.ttf
183 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf
183 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJ2aE0lP.ttf
195 ms
4-2.png
445 ms
5-1.png
423 ms
AdobeStock_177733208_Preview-1.png
425 ms
home_stock3.jpg
369 ms
AYCLpXzofN0NMiQugG7jQA.ttf
124 ms
AYCEpXzofN0NOp8LkA.ttf
124 ms
qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNlCV3lIb7Y.ttf
124 ms
qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNlwV3lIb7Y.ttf
148 ms
qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNkcV3lIb7Y.ttf
150 ms
qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNnCV3lIb7Y.ttf
150 ms
qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNmcUHlIb7Y.ttf
149 ms
qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNmlUHlIb7Y.ttf
124 ms
qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNnCUHlIb7Y.ttf
148 ms
widget.js
256 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
381 ms
home_stock4.jpg
405 ms
seagull_logo_small.png
394 ms
AdobeStock_74213045_2000px.jpg
439 ms
landlord-tenant_law-1.jpg
384 ms
js
67 ms
analytics.js
65 ms
co-ownership_disputes.jpg
365 ms
easement_boundary_disputes.jpg
404 ms
other_areas.jpg
387 ms
AdobeStock_256612192_wide_updated.jpg
386 ms
embed
402 ms
collect
51 ms
external_forms.js
38 ms
js
53 ms
widget_app_base_1707998198539.js
18 ms
js
44 ms
stonesiegel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stonesiegel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stonesiegel.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonesiegel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonesiegel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonesiegel.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stone Siegel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: