4.9 sec in total
Visit storage.net now to see the best up-to-date Storage content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about storage.net
Storage practical solutions. Personal storage, network storage, computer storage, data storage, hard drives, and more…Visit storage.net
We analyzed Storage.net page load time and found that the first response time was 358 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
storage.net performance score
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Storage.net, 14% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 76.2 kB (33%)
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50.0 kB
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storage.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (61%)
storage.net accessibility score
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
storage.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
Serves images with low resolution
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
storage.net SEO score
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storage.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storage.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Storage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: