1.2 sec in total
213 ms
830 ms
125 ms
Visit storage.net now to see the best up-to-date Storage content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about storage.net
Storage practical solutions. Personal storage, network storage, computer storage, data storage, hard drives, and more…
Visit storage.netWe analyzed Storage.net page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 955 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
storage.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value2,550 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
213 ms
30 ms
48 ms
49 ms
229 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Storage.net, 11% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (301 ms) belongs to the original domain Storage.net.
Page size can be reduced by 24.1 kB (12%)
198.1 kB
174.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Storage.net main page is 198.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 156.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storage.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (65%)
17
6
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.storage.net
213 ms
style.css
30 ms
layout.css
48 ms
custom.css
49 ms
styles.css
229 ms
jquery.js
82 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
48 ms
show_ads.js
71 ms
jquery.form.min.js
301 ms
scripts.js
300 ms
e-202410.js
6 ms
e-202410.js
27 ms
adsbygoogle.js
103 ms
icon-rss.gif
29 ms
network-storage-sm.jpg
29 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
dot-ddd.gif
44 ms
collect
32 ms
js
117 ms
storage.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
storage.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
storage.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storage.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storage.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
storage.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Storage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: