3.6 sec in total
224 ms
3 sec
298 ms
Visit storykeeper.com now to see the best up-to-date Story Keeper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about storykeeper.com
Create a memory-based keepsake book by answering questions each week. Share stories with your loved ones and preserve your personal history
Visit storykeeper.comWe analyzed Storykeeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
storykeeper.com performance score
224 ms
212 ms
1108 ms
424 ms
294 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Storykeeper.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Storykeeper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 581.4 kB (52%)
1.1 MB
532.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Storykeeper.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 430.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Story Keeper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 187.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.5 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 359.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storykeeper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 359.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (55%)
40
18
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Story Keeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
storykeeper.com
224 ms
www.storykeeper.com
212 ms
www.storykeeper.com
1108 ms
bootstrap.css
424 ms
style.css
294 ms
superfish.css
261 ms
font-awesome.min.css
36 ms
css
59 ms
responsive.css
268 ms
jquery.min.js
58 ms
responsivemobilemenu.js
280 ms
enscroll-0.6.1.min.js
399 ms
superfish.min.js
343 ms
facebook.init.js
355 ms
facebook.js
370 ms
hoverIntent.js
361 ms
bootstrap.min.js
35 ms
jquery.validate.js
140 ms
additional-methods.min.js
171 ms
common.js
462 ms
getSeal
489 ms
all.js
455 ms
logo-beta1.png
482 ms
homepage-main-above-fold.jpg
351 ms
facebook-icon.jpg
95 ms
homepage-qanda-example.png
414 ms
Family-photo-from-1940s-homepage.jpg
384 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
mob-nav-btn.png
117 ms
k8SEZH007WU
121 ms
615 ms
menu-divider.jpg
202 ms
magnifying_glass.png
203 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
72 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
87 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
92 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
100 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
100 ms
siteseal_gd_3_h_l_m.gif
89 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
collect
31 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
27 ms
www-embed-player.js
56 ms
base.js
94 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
47 ms
ad_status.js
44 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
14 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
12 ms
136 ms
xd_arbiter.php
426 ms
xd_arbiter.php
339 ms
storykeeper.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storykeeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storykeeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
storykeeper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Story Keeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: