7.2 sec in total
260 ms
6.6 sec
419 ms
Click here to check amazing Strange content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about strange.watch
{:en}Apps for your watch with limitless potential. Personalisable styles, utilities apps and cycling apps to make the most of your Android/Wear OS watch.{:nl}Your Watch With Limitless Potential. Perso...
Visit strange.watchWe analyzed Strange.watch page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
strange.watch performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value23.3 s
0/100
25%
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value2,460 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.164
72/100
15%
Value23.1 s
1/100
10%
260 ms
733 ms
70 ms
372 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Strange.watch, 7% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Strange.watch.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (8%)
12.8 MB
11.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Strange.watch main page is 12.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 11.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 642.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Strange images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 329.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Strange.watch needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 329.7 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (75%)
95
24
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Strange. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
strange.watch
260 ms
strange.watch
733 ms
js
70 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
372 ms
layerslider.css
40 ms
style.min.css
508 ms
classic-themes.min.css
35 ms
styles.css
379 ms
settings.css
494 ms
font-awesome.min.css
400 ms
magnific-popup.css
59 ms
slick.css
399 ms
iscwp-public.css
732 ms
frontend.min.css
837 ms
flatpickr.min.css
738 ms
select2.min.css
747 ms
public.css
853 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
866 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
1086 ms
main.min.css
1327 ms
style-custom.css
1104 ms
css
56 ms
animate.min.css
1194 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
1208 ms
carousel-theme.css
1220 ms
polaroid_carousel.css
1099 ms
showcase_carousel.css
1453 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
1120 ms
grid_fallback.min.css
1131 ms
grid_style.min.css
1492 ms
enjoy-instagram.css
1311 ms
greensock.js
1768 ms
jquery.min.js
1683 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1671 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1910 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1816 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2056 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2134 ms
rightclickdisable.js
1695 ms
api.js
51 ms
flatpickr.min.js
2157 ms
select2.min.js
2201 ms
tracker.js
1793 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
2291 ms
js
50 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
56 ms
collect
30 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
2016 ms
modernizr.custom.26633.min.js
2032 ms
jquery.gridrotator.min.js
2101 ms
ios-orientationchange-fix.min.js
2110 ms
modernizr.min.js
2100 ms
classie.min.js
1851 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2459 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
2011 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1776 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
2050 ms
core.min.js
2041 ms
main-vendors.min.js
1668 ms
main.min.js
2122 ms
index.js
2108 ms
index.js
2207 ms
frontend.min.js
2199 ms
new-tab.js
2187 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
2123 ms
slick.min.js
2275 ms
iscwp-public.js
2262 ms
hit
1597 ms
LRf87Oq-afg
233 ms
wn-footer-w.png
699 ms
sw-web-0317.png
1111 ms
SW3.jpg
1672 ms
lodyas-1.png
1045 ms
ion48_2000w.jpg
1847 ms
velocity-feature-1024x538.png
1744 ms
ion-2-0-1-1024x538.png
1996 ms
cruising_post-1024x538.png
1987 ms
26193-04b277bc9e36da8b8e523e2f46edb8fe-1024x573.jpg
1785 ms
strobe-post-feature-1024x538.png
2411 ms
vpost-feature-1024x538.png
2646 ms
ion-post-1024x538.png
2680 ms
cola-bright-1024x538.png
2510 ms
styles-w-1024x538.png
2947 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3t-4s6Voq.woff
31 ms
7cHpv4kjgoGqM7E_Ass_.woff
45 ms
bateaux.woff
2678 ms
7cHrv4kjgoGqM7E_Cfs1wHk.woff
75 ms
7cHsv4kjgoGqM7E_CfOA5WogvTw.woff
75 ms
www-player.css
10 ms
www-embed-player.js
30 ms
base.js
60 ms
ad_status.js
269 ms
UyQhPWNsNa0oRkd8oSQlA6PkpWpORMW0CLBRczdusu0.js
177 ms
embed.js
136 ms
7QVnRQaqDuJ99qrEYT3T-JXvV0Oam-FgPUmiFb-kobSdJpw9ij6FoUZ0bumdZTlx1f2CB40CSQ=s68-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj
282 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
33 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
32 ms
id
162 ms
Create
240 ms
recaptcha__en.js
161 ms
iframe_api
525 ms
GenerateIT
12 ms
www-widgetapi.js
6 ms
strange.watch accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
strange.watch best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
strange.watch SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Strange.watch can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Strange.watch main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
strange.watch
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Strange. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: