25.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
23.4 sec
572 ms
Visit structureresearch.net now to see the best up-to-date Structure Research content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about structureresearch.net
Structure Research is an independent research and consulting firm with a specific focus on the hosting and cloud segments within the Internet infrastructure market. We are devoted to understanding, tr...
Visit structureresearch.netWe analyzed Structureresearch.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 24 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
structureresearch.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
1600 ms
132 ms
128 ms
138 ms
131 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Structureresearch.net, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Video.websking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 545.4 kB (32%)
1.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Structureresearch.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Structure Research images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 218.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 218.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Structureresearch.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (56%)
54
24
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Structure Research. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
structureresearch.net
1600 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
132 ms
styles.css
128 ms
stock_widget_style.css
138 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
131 ms
woocommerce.css
138 ms
bootstrap.min.css
217 ms
bootstrap-select.css
321 ms
style.css
323 ms
responsive-style.css
321 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
322 ms
form-basic.min.css
320 ms
ipq.js
231 ms
matweetfeeds-style.css
1098 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
1244 ms
jquery.form.min.js
597 ms
scripts.js
877 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1091 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1223 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1219 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
1306 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1326 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1332 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
1393 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1602 ms
main-script.js
1395 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1396 ms
forms-api.min.js
1406 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1107 ms
css
508 ms
442 ms
advertisement.js
440 ms
flowplayer-3.2.12.min.js
20401 ms
ga.js
89 ms
logo.png
414 ms
bannerImg-1.jpg
739 ms
hostingImg.png
406 ms
cloudImg.png
408 ms
dataCenterImg.png
408 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-27-at-12.02.35-PM-300x300.png
667 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-11-17-at-11.39.33-AM-300x300.png
737 ms
dhcapital-e1446838186504.png
434 ms
keppeldc-e1446837495301.png
511 ms
logo-terago-white-e1446837778503.png
869 ms
sciencelogic-logo-e1446845498985.png
681 ms
serviceBg.jpg
1430 ms
serviceImg-1.png
803 ms
serviceImg-2.png
868 ms
serviceImg-3.png
872 ms
serviceImg-4.png
901 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-12-at-11.11.22-AM-231x300.png
1118 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-11-17-at-11.28.31-AM-231x300.png
1157 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
624 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
674 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
719 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
737 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
735 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
717 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1317 ms
__utm.gif
306 ms
structureresearch.net
1453 ms
bx_loader.gif
761 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
103 ms
structureresearch.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
structureresearch.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
structureresearch.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Structureresearch.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Structureresearch.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
structureresearch.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Structure Research. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: