Tools & Wizards About Us
stuartlippman.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

stuartlippman.com

Collection Agency, Commercial Debt Recovery and Consumer Debt Collection Recovery Agency

Page Load Speed

885 ms in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

457 ms

Page Rendered

417 ms

stuartlippman.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stuartlippman.com homepage info - get ready to check Stuartlippman best content right away, or after learning these important things about stuartlippman.com

Stuart-Lippman and Associates is a nationally recognized agency providing collection, subrogation, arbitration and accounts receivable management solutions to insurance providers, financial and commer...

Visit stuartlippman.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stuartlippman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 874 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stuartlippman.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stuartlippman.com

11 ms

www.stuartlippman.com

52 ms

js

226 ms

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Stuartlippman.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (226 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 221.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stuartlippman.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 35.8 kB
  • After minification 22.1 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.7 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 184.4 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stuartlippman images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 87.7 kB
  • After minification 87.7 kB
  • After compression 86.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 61.4 kB
  • After minification 61.4 kB
  • After compression 56.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stuartlippman.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (56%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stuartlippman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stuartlippman.com

stuartlippman.com

11 ms

www.stuartlippman.com

www.stuartlippman.com

52 ms

js

js

226 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

22 ms

reset.css

reset.css

22 ms

style.css

style.css

25 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

33 ms

social.css

social.css

34 ms

logo.png

logo.png

32 ms

call.png

call.png

30 ms

get-quote.gif

get-quote.gif

31 ms

check.png

check.png

31 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

42 ms

arrow.jpg

arrow.jpg

41 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

40 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

44 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

41 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

39 ms

jquery.nice-select.js

jquery.nice-select.js

45 ms

menumaker.js

menumaker.js

42 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

44 ms

slider.js

slider.js

41 ms

active.js

active.js

44 ms

jquery.contact-buttons.js

jquery.contact-buttons.js

47 ms

member.png

member.png

49 ms

menumaker.css

menumaker.css

26 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

25 ms

animate.css

animate.css

28 ms

hover.css

hover.css

30 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

29 ms

second-home.css

second-home.css

34 ms

third-home.css

third-home.css

28 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

34 ms

Pe-icon-7-stroke.css

Pe-icon-7-stroke.css

35 ms

css

css

36 ms

css

css

14 ms

slider1.png

slider1.png

153 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

7 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

7 ms

google.png

google.png

8 ms

fb.png

fb.png

29 ms

tw.png

tw.png

7 ms

gp.png

gp.png

6 ms

phone.png

phone.png

30 ms

mail.png

mail.png

30 ms

slider2.png

slider2.png

77 ms

slider3.png

slider3.png

76 ms

NeueEinstellung-Regular.woff

NeueEinstellung-Regular.woff

29 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

74 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

92 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

93 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

106 ms

Pe-icon-7-strokebb1d.woff

Pe-icon-7-strokebb1d.woff

29 ms

js

js

88 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

Accessibility Review

stuartlippman.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

stuartlippman.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

stuartlippman.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stuartlippman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stuartlippman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stuartlippman.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stuartlippman. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: