Tools & Wizards About Us
studiomag.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

studiomag.net

Progettazione grafica e Web Design per la comunicazione - STUDIO MAG

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

338 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

studiomag.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing STUDIO MAG content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studiomag.net

Progettazione grafica e web design in linea con la tua necessità comunicativa. Soluzioni ideali creati allineando fantasia a razionalità, impatto visivo con rigore grafico.

Visit studiomag.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiomag.net page load time and found that the first response time was 338 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiomag.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value35.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,350 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value51.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studiomag.net

338 ms

www.studiomag.net

741 ms

style.min.css

104 ms

portfolio.css

207 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

297 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Studiomag.net, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Studiomag.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studiomag.net main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

  • Original 62.8 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. STUDIO MAG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 489.4 kB
  • After minification 489.4 kB
  • After compression 470.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 147.1 kB
  • After minification 146.9 kB
  • After compression 143.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiomag.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (74%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of STUDIO MAG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studiomag.net

studiomag.net

338 ms

www.studiomag.net

www.studiomag.net

741 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

104 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

207 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

297 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

303 ms

style.css

style.css

400 ms

header-perma-transparent.css

header-perma-transparent.css

305 ms

caroufredsel.css

caroufredsel.css

306 ms

css

css

36 ms

fullpage.css

fullpage.css

307 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

396 ms

skin-material.css

skin-material.css

415 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

413 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

418 ms

custom.css

custom.css

422 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

496 ms

style.css

style.css

508 ms

css

css

51 ms

iubenda_cs.js

iubenda_cs.js

63 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

597 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

522 ms

js

js

81 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

57 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

521 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

521 ms

core.css

core.css

592 ms

slide-out-right-material.css

slide-out-right-material.css

593 ms

slide-out-right-hover.css

slide-out-right-hover.css

594 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

694 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

694 ms

salient-portfolio.js

salient-portfolio.js

695 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

696 ms

caroufredsel.min.js

caroufredsel.min.js

696 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

695 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

717 ms

priority.js

priority.js

718 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

820 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

821 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

819 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

820 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.js

jquery.fullPage.min.js

940 ms

nectar-full-page-rows.js

nectar-full-page-rows.js

821 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

841 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

728 ms

init.js

init.js

735 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

633 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

84 ms

logo_MAG2020-brand.png

logo_MAG2020-brand.png

329 ms

mag-logo-light-1.png

mag-logo-light-1.png

428 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

133 ms

Sagra-MeleMiele-Baceno-ph.-Susy-Mezzanotte-46-dimensioni-grandi.jpeg

Sagra-MeleMiele-Baceno-ph.-Susy-Mezzanotte-46-dimensioni-grandi.jpeg

707 ms

estatoilmaggiordomo_social.jpg

estatoilmaggiordomo_social.jpg

611 ms

the-witches-seed-03.jpg

the-witches-seed-03.jpg

526 ms

morisetti_TotS_DSCF8132.jpeg

morisetti_TotS_DSCF8132.jpeg

610 ms

Scene-1.jpg

Scene-1.jpg

512 ms

twergitrek-logo.jpg

twergitrek-logo.jpg

826 ms

DSF3999.jpg

DSF3999.jpg

1803 ms

ACB-FABIO-TROIANO-7-dimensioni-grandi.jpeg

ACB-FABIO-TROIANO-7-dimensioni-grandi.jpeg

1811 ms

voglia-di-coro-1.jpg

voglia-di-coro-1.jpg

710 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

107 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

601 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

707 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

83 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

82 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

82 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

82 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

83 ms

ads

ads

64 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

103 ms

Accessibility Review

studiomag.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

studiomag.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiomag.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Studiomag.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studiomag.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of STUDIO MAG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: