4.5 sec in total
899 ms
3 sec
551 ms
Welcome to studiorendering.com homepage info - get ready to check Studio Rendering best content right away, or after learning these important things about studiorendering.com
Visit studiorendering.comWe analyzed Studiorendering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 899 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
studiorendering.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value19.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.9 s
2/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
899 ms
69 ms
130 ms
195 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Studiorendering.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (899 ms) belongs to the original domain Studiorendering.com.
Page size can be reduced by 772.0 kB (43%)
1.8 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Studiorendering.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 898.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 154.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio Rendering images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 589.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 121 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiorendering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121 B or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (52%)
97
47
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Rendering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.studiorendering.com
899 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
69 ms
style.css
130 ms
foundation.css
195 ms
app.css
128 ms
prettyCheckable.css
130 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
131 ms
offcanvas.css
130 ms
style.css
204 ms
css
25 ms
comments.css
201 ms
basic.css
209 ms
royalslider.css
206 ms
rs-universal.css
207 ms
html5.js
262 ms
jquery.js
324 ms
anti-spam.js
256 ms
modernizr.foundation.js
259 ms
widgets.js
9 ms
html5.js
39 ms
ajax-page-loader.js
256 ms
reload_code.js
260 ms
addthis_widget.js
12 ms
subscriber-count
117 ms
slim-081711.css
18 ms
af-script.js
318 ms
foundation.min.js
472 ms
jquery.offcanvas.js
318 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
436 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
433 ms
prettyCheckable.js
437 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
439 ms
app.js
437 ms
hoverIntent.js
438 ms
js
39 ms
ubermenu.min.js
438 ms
social.js
451 ms
wp-embed.min.js
452 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
521 ms
wordpress_securi.php
588 ms
Thumbnail5-240x324.jpg
473 ms
Thumbnail8-240x324.jpg
474 ms
Thumbnail7-240x324.jpg
96 ms
thumb-b-240x324.jpg
97 ms
Thumbnail2-240x324.jpg
473 ms
Thumbnail1-240x324.jpg
475 ms
thumbnail12-240x324.jpg
474 ms
Thumbnail6-240x324.jpg
475 ms
thumb-240x324.jpg
476 ms
Thumbnail-240x324.jpg
478 ms
hardRockHotel-240x324.jpg
473 ms
thumbnail9-240x324.jpg
476 ms
thumbnail7-240x324.jpg
478 ms
Oscar-240x360.png
586 ms
536251_10153370966955165_2005088371_n1-240x259.jpg
478 ms
Thumb-240x324.jpg
479 ms
Ash-Mohammed-240x259.jpg
479 ms
MC-240x259.jpg
480 ms
thumb4-240x324.jpg
481 ms
Winston-and-I-240x259.jpg
482 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
bg_header.jpg
463 ms
icon_toplinks.png
464 ms
logo_dropdown.png
465 ms
logo_main.jpg
466 ms
collect
52 ms
vc-credit.png
438 ms
sprite_footer-social.png
439 ms
300lo.json
180 ms
ie67-css.d5089428ac7f05efd372.js
171 ms
SMALL%20-%20Circle%20Ball.gif
199 ms
common.js
44 ms
map.js
43 ms
util.js
136 ms
geocoder.js
132 ms
icon_category-work.png
140 ms
icon_share.png
139 ms
icon_category-learn.png
136 ms
icon_category-life.png
136 ms
login-sprite.png
137 ms
icon_closebutton.png
140 ms
icon_filter.jpg
207 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
103 ms
onion.js
55 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
105 ms
GeocodeService.Search
109 ms
GeocodeService.Search
51 ms
marker.js
18 ms
controls.js
21 ms
transparent.png
28 ms
css
18 ms
google4.png
70 ms
mapcnt6.png
28 ms
sv5.png
28 ms
spotlight-poi.png
28 ms
tmapctrl.png
23 ms
cb_scout5.png
24 ms
tmapctrl4.png
23 ms
imgs8.png
23 ms
studiorendering.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
studiorendering.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
studiorendering.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiorendering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiorendering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
studiorendering.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studio Rendering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: