6.9 sec in total
257 ms
6.4 sec
248 ms
Visit studiorochford.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Studio Rochford content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about studiorochford.co.uk
Essex Wedding Photographer Studio Rochford offers a stunning blend of creative and documentary wedding photography and gorgeous family portrait photography
Visit studiorochford.co.ukWe analyzed Studiorochford.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 257 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
studiorochford.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value1,660 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.401
25/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
257 ms
2401 ms
698 ms
794 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Studiorochford.co.uk, 4% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Studiorochford.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 213.8 kB (4%)
4.8 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Studiorochford.co.uk main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio Rochford images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 59.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiorochford.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (67%)
99
33
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Rochford. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
studiorochford.co.uk
257 ms
www.studiorochford.co.uk
2401 ms
www.studiorochford.co.uk
698 ms
dynamic-style.php
794 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.css
252 ms
wpapp-styles.css
251 ms
sb-instagram-2-2.min.css
286 ms
style.min.css
293 ms
lptw-recent-posts.css
330 ms
styles.css
330 ms
jetpack.css
463 ms
jquery.js
477 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.min.js
410 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
412 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
489 ms
public.js
490 ms
vertical-m.css
552 ms
hoverIntent.js
568 ms
superfish.js
572 ms
supersubs.js
573 ms
clickprotect.js
641 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
660 ms
jplayer.style.css
653 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
652 ms
magnific-popup.css
701 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
743 ms
magnific-popup-v0.9.9.min.js
739 ms
galleria.nextgen_pro_slideshow.css
740 ms
trigger_buttons.css
755 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
781 ms
v4-shims.css
225 ms
all.css
423 ms
breadcrumbs.css
815 ms
nextgen_pro_grid_album.css
805 ms
blank.css
815 ms
nggallery.css
827 ms
comment-reply.min.js
841 ms
effect.min.js
856 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
878 ms
jquery.browser.min.js
57 ms
v4-shims.js
314 ms
all.js
476 ms
e-202241.js
35 ms
masonry.min.js
876 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
680 ms
lptw-recent-posts.js
695 ms
scripts.js
660 ms
wp-embed.min.js
683 ms
sb-instagram-2-2.min.js
654 ms
galleria-1.5.5.js
741 ms
ngg_galleria.js
608 ms
galleria.nextgen_pro_slideshow.js
627 ms
picturefill.js
562 ms
ajax.min.js
599 ms
common.js
654 ms
lightbox_context.js
624 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
551 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
563 ms
nextgen_fancybox_init.js
583 ms
jquery.dotdotdot-1.5.7-packed.js
593 ms
nextgen_pro_album_init.js
565 ms
reset.css
419 ms
rebuild.css
446 ms
wp.css
438 ms
default.css
448 ms
base.css
83 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
109 ms
fbevents.js
84 ms
wedding-photographers-essex.png
280 ms
placeholder.png
280 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
81 ms
Qw3EZQFXECDrI2q789EKQZJob0x6XH0.ttf
255 ms
wlp_gwjKBV1pqhv43IQ.ttf
257 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1099.JPG
434 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1100.JPG
410 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1101.JPG
540 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1102.JPG
336 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1103.JPG
498 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1104.JPG
448 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1105.JPG
492 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1106.JPG
491 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1107.JPG
598 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1108.JPG
631 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1109.JPG
648 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1110.JPG
574 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1111.JPG
676 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1112.JPG
720 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1113.JPG
655 ms
best-wedding-photographers-essex-1114.JPG
677 ms
documentary-wedding-photography-essex-783.JPG-nggid03152-ngg0dyn-210x120x100-00f0w010c011r110f110r010t010.JPG
730 ms
best-wedding-photographer-essex-853-c65.JPG-nggid03199-ngg0dyn-210x120x100-00f0w010c011r110f110r010t010.JPG
727 ms
Essex-wedding-photographers-1152.JPG-nggid03292-ngg0dyn-210x120x100-00f0w010c011r110f110r010t010.JPG
733 ms
best-wedding-photographer-essex-1040.JPG-nggid03251-ngg0dyn-210x120x100-00f0w010c011r110f110r010t010.JPG
774 ms
135603950548859
166 ms
analytics.js
157 ms
147678683_264977888527186_2354164689202101016_nlow.jpg
647 ms
148300150_109244314518347_8375742254591685589_nlow.jpg
638 ms
147272551_115392007186532_6210977305773685235_nlow.jpg
659 ms
95294476_667402680782579_6425307007296592769_nlow.jpg
641 ms
95339275_151096673090845_739070620976303989_nlow.jpg
701 ms
controls-map.png
716 ms
collect
14 ms
pause_button.png
634 ms
95339275_151096673090845_739070620976303989_nfull.jpg
94 ms
studiorochford.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
studiorochford.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
studiorochford.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiorochford.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiorochford.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
studiorochford.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studio Rochford. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: