Tools & Wizards About Us
studiov.website screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

studiov.website

Izrada web stranica - Izrada sajtova Crna Gora - Optimizacija i Održavanje

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

772 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

439 ms

studiov.website screenshot

About Website

Visit studiov.website now to see the best up-to-date Studiov content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about studiov.website

Profesionalna izrada sajtova Crna Gora. Pravila izrade web sajta: Ima dobro izabranu web adresu. Sajt je najpovoljniji vid promocije. Izrada sajtova zahtijeva kompletno vizuelno rešenje, prilagođeno s...

Visit studiov.website

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiov.website page load time and found that the first response time was 772 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiov.website performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,120 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.051

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studiov.website

772 ms

analytics.js

37 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

219 ms

styles.css

247 ms

form.min.css

310 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Studiov.website, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Studiov.website.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 148.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

686.5 kB

After Optimization

538.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studiov.website main page is 686.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 259.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 75.9 kB

  • Original 94.6 kB
  • After minification 92.8 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 180 B

  • Original 259.5 kB
  • After minification 259.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studiov images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

  • Original 215.8 kB
  • After minification 215.8 kB
  • After compression 178.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 116.6 kB
  • After minification 116.4 kB
  • After compression 81.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiov.website needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (63%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studiov. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studiov.website

studiov.website

772 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

37 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

219 ms

styles.css

styles.css

247 ms

form.min.css

form.min.css

310 ms

style.css

style.css

245 ms

base.css

base.css

290 ms

layout.css

layout.css

376 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

483 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

465 ms

jquery.ui.all.css

jquery.ui.all.css

449 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.css

jplayer.blue.monday.css

503 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

591 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

759 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

655 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

466 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

684 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

701 ms

index.js

index.js

717 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

823 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

859 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

899 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

919 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

947 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1187 ms

menu.js

menu.js

1039 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

1077 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

1160 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

1131 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1263 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1260 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1303 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

1358 ms

form.min.js

form.min.js

1428 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

32 ms

Izrada-sajtova-crna-gora_resize-compressed.jpg

Izrada-sajtova-crna-gora_resize-compressed.jpg

756 ms

Izrada-sajtova-Crna-Gora.png

Izrada-sajtova-Crna-Gora.png

715 ms

list_check.png

list_check.png

714 ms

home_webdesign_offer1_icon.png

home_webdesign_offer1_icon.png

734 ms

shutterstock_193745936_resize-compressed.jpg

shutterstock_193745936_resize-compressed.jpg

905 ms

search-SEO-128.png

search-SEO-128.png

732 ms

digitalni-print-podgorica.jpg

digitalni-print-podgorica.jpg

1027 ms

izrada-sajta-crna-gora-1.jpg

izrada-sajta-crna-gora-1.jpg

1085 ms

home_webdesign_pattern1.png

home_webdesign_pattern1.png

932 ms

home_webdesign_about_bg.jpg

home_webdesign_about_bg.jpg

1024 ms

home_webdesign_pattern2.png

home_webdesign_pattern2.png

985 ms

fc.woff

fc.woff

1167 ms

box_shadow.png

box_shadow.png

441 ms

bg_panel.png

bg_panel.png

549 ms

Accessibility Review

studiov.website accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

studiov.website best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

studiov.website SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    BS

  • Language Claimed

    BS

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiov.website can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiov.website main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studiov.website

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studiov. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: