4.5 sec in total
113 ms
2.3 sec
2 sec
Visit styleranking.de now to see the best up-to-date Styleranking content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about styleranking.de
styleranking, Agentur und Spezialist für Influencer Marketing seit 2007, kreiert erfolgreiche Influencer Marketing-Kampagnen und veranstaltet das InfluencerCafé
Visit styleranking.deWe analyzed Styleranking.de page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
styleranking.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value990 ms
28/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
113 ms
165 ms
855 ms
323 ms
236 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Styleranking.de, 28% (19 requests) were made to Encore.scdn.co and 23% (16 requests) were made to Embed-cdn.spotifycdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (855 ms) belongs to the original domain Styleranking.de.
Page size can be reduced by 48.8 kB (1%)
3.3 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Styleranking.de main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Styleranking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 43 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Styleranking.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (47%)
34
18
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Styleranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
styleranking.de
113 ms
styleranking.de
165 ms
www.styleranking.de
855 ms
styles.6562664017.css
323 ms
5fJIu0XrVPNc4aPTLMXhF4
236 ms
styleranking-pnk.svg
185 ms
Kisu_1-Copyright-Kisu.jpg
553 ms
louisa-07_2021-12-08-084457.jpg
72 ms
HAENDRIXEN-5199_2021-10-21-100933.jpg
626 ms
image00003_2021-10-07-130645.jpg
97 ms
Mario_Novembre_Believe_Artist_Services_2021-10-07-120825.jpg
551 ms
SophiaThiel_cZS-Verlag_DanCarabas-2_jpg.jpg
89 ms
scripts.6562664017.js
426 ms
C2zQ2HjIZ9q.jpg
88 ms
CzEnrzDICnz.jpg
30 ms
CzCOPUMIAkT.jpg
43 ms
Cy6U1rZIBG5.jpg
41 ms
Cy02tL4IKvQ.jpg
53 ms
CupGoWmIrfA.jpg
50 ms
CumNU1ho4Ze.jpg
56 ms
CukY47aINsg.jpg
57 ms
f4338d83daa9ef42.css
21 ms
7ffda23de73b1eea.css
23 ms
364d0cc114e2dc9d.css
26 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
34 ms
webpack-aecf03b65936f004.js
52 ms
framework-ca706bf673a13738.js
53 ms
main-08df201b32607c28.js
51 ms
_app-5015897cc12b2ccc.js
62 ms
fec483df-ed779ce1028b7b0c.js
62 ms
7532-9ada25933e41e6fd.js
74 ms
239-6eb6b98f9c269af8.js
75 ms
7469-9023e7d706cae02d.js
73 ms
4952-384933bceeba12f8.js
73 ms
%5Bid%5D-1ef4d3de5ecc7a82.js
74 ms
_buildManifest.js
73 ms
_ssgManifest.js
85 ms
CircularSpTitle-Bold-1624fb2df28c20d7203d7fb86ce8b481.woff
79 ms
CircularSpTitle-Black-506746f387a26f25aa3d023b3e501d34.woff
95 ms
CircularSp-Arab-Book-1cd31794cbdd53724469ba03e8573dba.woff
122 ms
CircularSp-Arab-Bold-47ca0fd648a183136981f28d0218cef6.woff
111 ms
CircularSp-Arab-Black-9dda323448d48d7e6cabf84d2df7dc11.woff
106 ms
CircularSp-Hebr-Book-d8209975eafc81a9499df8401a339ddd.woff
111 ms
CircularSp-Hebr-Bold-caa03e4cb8690e726ef1625c7d91a7a5.woff
102 ms
CircularSp-Hebr-Black-f52613a9d541248805af1d0bb33102f8.woff
112 ms
CircularSp-Cyrl-Book-6f078f781ee313e298ad8997fd1ffe3d.woff
121 ms
CircularSp-Cyrl-Bold-7e54bccaf45728c472079785d5cd4519.woff
120 ms
CircularSp-Cyrl-Black-b4305d9bf82554f631d2636c3ef90c54.woff
121 ms
CircularSp-Grek-Book-c9de2c0741586c1ab7b6e95541fc7807.woff
122 ms
CircularSp-Grek-Bold-53bb923248ba22cf5554bbe5f434c5c8.woff
136 ms
CircularSp-Grek-Black-49883536c1a3bfc688235ce40572731d.woff
137 ms
CircularSp-Deva-Book-e1dc3d746b24723f8d3dadb314b97705.woff
138 ms
CircularSp-Deva-Bold-a218ed3bd8e480245847933a79f4ebfb.woff
139 ms
CircularSp-Deva-Black-f1dca2ee660273063af0316d4b7da438.woff
137 ms
CircularSp-Book-3f73da7d35bd81c706bce7bbb84964de.woff
160 ms
CircularSp-Bold-856afe2da4ba4e61239b129e2c16d633.woff
139 ms
prompt-v2-latin-300.woff
216 ms
prompt-v2-latin-200.woff
262 ms
prompt-v2-latin-100.woff
150 ms
prompt-v2-latin-regular.woff
231 ms
prompt-v2-latin-500.woff
92 ms
prompt-v2-latin-600.woff
261 ms
prompt-v2-latin-700.woff
310 ms
prompt-v2-latin-800.woff
363 ms
prompt-v2-latin-900.woff
427 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
663 ms
fa-light-300.woff
678 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
618 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
443 ms
styleranking.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
styleranking.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
styleranking.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Styleranking.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Styleranking.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
styleranking.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Styleranking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: