Tools & Wizards About Us
successclicks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

successclicks.com

Worldprofit SuccessClicks - Working from home the successful clicks way - Claim Free Bar of Silver Today

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

765 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

312 ms

successclicks.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Success Clicks content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about successclicks.com

World Profit and SuccessClicks you can now start living the dream with a TRUSTED SOURCE that can help you live the dream! SuccessClicks.com with Wordprofit gives you trusted resources you need to give...

Visit successclicks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Successclicks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 765 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

successclicks.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

successclicks.com

765 ms

main-style.css

125 ms

all.js

70 ms

ga.js

41 ms

Daniel%20Fischer2.JPG

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Successclicks.com, 45% (25 requests) were made to Fbstatic-a.akamaihd.net and 13% (7 requests) were made to Worldprofit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Worldprofit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 908.9 kB (22%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Successclicks.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 17.6 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 893.1 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Success Clicks needs image optimization as it can save up to 893.1 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 500 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Successclicks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (40%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Success Clicks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

successclicks.com

successclicks.com

765 ms

main-style.css

main-style.css

125 ms

all.js

all.js

70 ms

ga.js

ga.js

41 ms

Daniel%20Fischer2.JPG

Daniel%20Fischer2.JPG

185 ms

250000_frame.cfm

250000_frame.cfm

171 ms

ezsharegenerator.PNG

ezsharegenerator.PNG

485 ms

craigslistoutsourcing.png

craigslistoutsourcing.png

601 ms

wordpressVolume1.PNG

wordpressVolume1.PNG

929 ms

fastlistbuilding.PNG

fastlistbuilding.PNG

790 ms

membershipvideos.png

membershipvideos.png

1055 ms

wordpressVolume2.PNG

wordpressVolume2.PNG

1069 ms

rss.png

rss.png

46 ms

FaceBook-icon.png

FaceBook-icon.png

61 ms

skype-icon.png

skype-icon.png

61 ms

newslettersignup.jpg

newslettersignup.jpg

81 ms

121 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

95 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

151 ms

ping

ping

115 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

comments.php

comments.php

201 ms

like.php

like.php

127 ms

cfform.js

cfform.js

158 ms

masks.js

masks.js

47 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

39 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

40 ms

E3TzvQNU166.css

E3TzvQNU166.css

7 ms

Q-OWgaJvbhn.css

Q-OWgaJvbhn.css

9 ms

MATGADE8ffC.css

MATGADE8ffC.css

34 ms

EQVvsAj4CHs.css

EQVvsAj4CHs.css

24 ms

q68gy-v_YMF.js

q68gy-v_YMF.js

45 ms

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

63 ms

0wM5s1Khldu.js

0wM5s1Khldu.js

37 ms

LTv6ZK-5zxz.js

LTv6ZK-5zxz.js

72 ms

1FCa-btixu2.js

1FCa-btixu2.js

57 ms

Oagsvfb4VWi.js

Oagsvfb4VWi.js

56 ms

FyxLoiww5bU.js

FyxLoiww5bU.js

70 ms

HaMjR2eXz4B.js

HaMjR2eXz4B.js

61 ms

WN2wSsLOuKy.js

WN2wSsLOuKy.js

97 ms

Kt4tkgSRvHH.js

Kt4tkgSRvHH.js

96 ms

Q4A0UyjU8W2.js

Q4A0UyjU8W2.js

102 ms

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

104 ms

1958180_729810943718860_1696950809_n.jpg

1958180_729810943718860_1696950809_n.jpg

113 ms

fav.png

fav.png

27 ms

15903_754728144620160_2671119253471306210_n.jpg

15903_754728144620160_2671119253471306210_n.jpg

90 ms

294841_126547084107375_8046874_n.jpg

294841_126547084107375_8046874_n.jpg

97 ms

11011112_1594046687532626_2205311084957536337_n.jpg

11011112_1594046687532626_2205311084957536337_n.jpg

100 ms

12342580_1655601194716183_8750204286450462660_n.jpg

12342580_1655601194716183_8750204286450462660_n.jpg

139 ms

odA9sNLrE86.jpg

odA9sNLrE86.jpg

13 ms

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

14 ms

K00K-UgnsKu.png

K00K-UgnsKu.png

14 ms

pimRBh7B6ER.png

pimRBh7B6ER.png

13 ms

eR-qA8bp1RM.js

eR-qA8bp1RM.js

5 ms

I6-MnjEovm5.js

I6-MnjEovm5.js

5 ms

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

successclicks.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

successclicks.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

successclicks.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Successclicks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Successclicks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

successclicks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Success Clicks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: