7.5 sec in total
2.5 sec
4.7 sec
351 ms
Welcome to sugar-mond.com homepage info - get ready to check Sugar Mond best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about sugar-mond.com
新宿在住の現役WebデザイナーがWeb・デザイン・SEO・アフィリエイト・ダイエット・生活・人生などについて気ままに語ります。
Visit sugar-mond.comWe analyzed Sugar-mond.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
sugar-mond.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value530 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
2488 ms
342 ms
513 ms
5 ms
355 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Sugar-mond.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sugar-mond.com.
Page size can be reduced by 234.0 kB (60%)
391.6 kB
157.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Sugar-mond.com main page is 391.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 142.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 344 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugar Mond images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 56.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugar-mond.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (55%)
67
30
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugar Mond. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sugar-mond.com
2488 ms
normalize.css
342 ms
style.css
513 ms
font-awesome.css
5 ms
arpw-frontend.css
355 ms
styles.css
356 ms
screen.min.css
370 ms
wpp.css
511 ms
amazonjs.css
534 ms
jetpack.css
712 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
counter.css
538 ms
bookmark_button.js
305 ms
jquery.form.min.js,qver=3.51.0-2014.06.20.pagespeed.jm.RVBOol6lkO.js
633 ms
scripts.js,qver=4.3.pagespeed.jm.AQ2a9_TgU5.js
505 ms
front.min.js
327 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
57 ms
gprofiles.js
61 ms
base.js,qver=4.3.3.pagespeed.jm.wGognv44ns.js
356 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
424 ms
ga.js
91 ms
logo_011.png
251 ms
1x1.trans.gif
249 ms
share_twitter.png
249 ms
share_facebook.png
248 ms
share_gplus.png
247 ms
share_hatena.png
419 ms
share_line.png
421 ms
search.png
420 ms
848-featured-70x70.png
422 ms
2107-featured-70x70.png
423 ms
136-featured-70x70.png
422 ms
831-featured-70x70.png
578 ms
406-featured-70x70.png
705 ms
70x70x236-featured-70x70.png.pagespeed.ic.aaLuCVYOh9.png
704 ms
2568-featured-70x70.png
705 ms
790-featured-70x70.png
706 ms
2370-featured-70x70.png
706 ms
928-featured-70x70.png
728 ms
64834-70x70.png
735 ms
home148-70x70.png
732 ms
64618-70x70.png
745 ms
46073-70x70.png
744 ms
31940-70x70.png
770 ms
xkey188-70x70.png.pagespeed.ic.aJh7jioLc4.png
893 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
51 ms
__utm.gif
155 ms
313 ms
widgets.js
302 ms
book126.png
149 ms
monkey4.png
145 ms
unei.png
142 ms
all.js
124 ms
hovercard.css
166 ms
services.css
184 ms
shibuya.png
805 ms
floppy.png
787 ms
sinjyuk.png
1362 ms
mug.png
141 ms
male200.png
889 ms
computer-mouse.png
1194 ms
g.gif
141 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
260 ms
192 ms
xd_arbiter.php
47 ms
xd_arbiter.php
65 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.ja.html
50 ms
jot
109 ms
sugar-mond.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sugar-mond.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sugar-mond.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugar-mond.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugar-mond.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugar-mond.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugar Mond. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: