25.9 sec in total
2 sec
23.1 sec
719 ms
Welcome to sugardaddysite.us homepage info - get ready to check Sugardaddysite best content right away, or after learning these important things about sugardaddysite.us
Reviews and ratings of top 10 sugar daddy dating sites in 2016.Join the best sugar daddy sites to find a sugar daddy online now.
Visit sugardaddysite.usWe analyzed Sugardaddysite.us page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 23.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
sugardaddysite.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0.7 s
100/100
25%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
2038 ms
2016 ms
551 ms
861 ms
253 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Sugardaddysite.us, 2% (1 request) were made to Streamtest.github.io and 2% (1 request) were made to Secure.successfulmatch.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Streamtest.github.io.
Page size can be reduced by 248.5 kB (37%)
672.5 kB
423.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Sugardaddysite.us main page is 672.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 357.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugardaddysite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 140.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugardaddysite.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (38%)
42
26
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugardaddysite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sugardaddysite.us
2038 ms
style.css
2016 ms
styles.css
551 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
861 ms
default.css
253 ms
jquery.js
981 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
410 ms
modernizr.custom.97935.js
1509 ms
pc_modernizr_custom.js
969 ms
superfish.js
975 ms
pc_superfish_init.js
1393 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
1237 ms
custom-fancybox.js
1147 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
1248 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
1264 ms
jquery.form.min.js
952 ms
scripts.js
931 ms
wp-embed.min.js
929 ms
streamtest.js
20177 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1262 ms
sugardaddymeet1.jpg
363 ms
banner20140528-2.gif
574 ms
dmca_protected_11_120.png
361 ms
millionairematch1.jpg
306 ms
sugarsugar1.jpg
570 ms
seekingarrangement.jpg
238 ms
sugardaddyforme.jpg
378 ms
sugardaddyfinder.jpg
507 ms
sugardaddie.jpg
1109 ms
whatsyourprice.jpg
985 ms
marrymesugardaddy.jpg
1635 ms
sugardaddytoday.jpg
650 ms
facebook.png
645 ms
twitter.png
681 ms
google.png
743 ms
stumbleupon.png
743 ms
linkedin.png
752 ms
logo.png
140 ms
bg_rate.png
142 ms
rating.png
122 ms
bg-rightbox.gif
140 ms
count-bg.png
221 ms
search.png
223 ms
bullet.png
252 ms
sugardaddysite.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
sugardaddysite.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
sugardaddysite.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugardaddysite.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugardaddysite.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugardaddysite.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugardaddysite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: