Tools & Wizards About Us
sugarstreak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

sugarstreak.com

SugarStreak

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

170 ms

sugarstreak.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sugarstreak.com homepage info - get ready to check Sugar Streak best content right away, or after learning these important things about sugarstreak.com

SugarStreak produces uniqe hair-removal professionals who practice a safer, softer, and sweeter alternative to wax.

Visit sugarstreak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugarstreak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugarstreak.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,910 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.272

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sugarstreak.com

141 ms

sugarstreak.com

448 ms

theme-490ee1e0-b47a-013b-049f-563b55ecd336.css

71 ms

css

50 ms

conduit.js

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Sugarstreak.com, 36% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 36% (14 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Chimpstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sugarstreak.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 49.3 kB

  • Original 71.2 kB
  • After minification 66.4 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 253.2 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugar Streak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 786 B

  • Original 765.3 kB
  • After minification 765.3 kB
  • After compression 764.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (32%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugar Streak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sugarstreak.com

sugarstreak.com

141 ms

sugarstreak.com

sugarstreak.com

448 ms

theme-490ee1e0-b47a-013b-049f-563b55ecd336.css

theme-490ee1e0-b47a-013b-049f-563b55ecd336.css

71 ms

css

css

50 ms

conduit.js

conduit.js

184 ms

loader.js

loader.js

79 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

55 ms

csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js

csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js

53 ms

visitor_stencil.js

visitor_stencil.js

50 ms

widget.js

widget.js

52 ms

f3490d5c6cd3ad0180768d90e.js

f3490d5c6cd3ad0180768d90e.js

57 ms

dce446b7f0d1fbcdb72aa85b5.js

dce446b7f0d1fbcdb72aa85b5.js

1240 ms

nobot

nobot

157 ms

logo_1559873207__09046.original.png

logo_1559873207__09046.original.png

129 ms

SPECIALISTS_AND_GUESTS.png

SPECIALISTS_AND_GUESTS.png

57 ms

sugarrevolutionwebpic.png

sugarrevolutionwebpic.png

56 ms

BTOBWEBPIC.png

BTOBWEBPIC.png

55 ms

INVESTINKNOW_1.png

INVESTINKNOW_1.png

54 ms

SugarWarmerFrontWhiteBG__79052.1656172383.png

SugarWarmerFrontWhiteBG__79052.1656172383.png

382 ms

WarmerKit_WhiteBG__61500.1696351637.png

WarmerKit_WhiteBG__61500.1696351637.png

86 ms

SimpleKit_WhiteBG__42844.1696351637.png

SimpleKit_WhiteBG__42844.1696351637.png

495 ms

030404frontlights__84381.1706878885.jpg

030404frontlights__84381.1706878885.jpg

78 ms

sugarstreakusa2.png

sugarstreakusa2.png

230 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

27 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

37 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

44 ms

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf

43 ms

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

49 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

48 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

49 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

48 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

51 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

50 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

64 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

63 ms

qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNlCV3lIb7Y.ttf

qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNlCV3lIb7Y.ttf

63 ms

embed.js

embed.js

29 ms

index.php

index.php

115 ms

Accessibility Review

sugarstreak.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sugarstreak.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sugarstreak.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarstreak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarstreak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sugarstreak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sugar Streak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: