Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

sundrip.com

SUNDRIP – Art for Life – Sundrip Journals

Page Load Speed

28.3 sec in total

First Response

477 ms

Resources Loaded

21.7 sec

Page Rendered

6.1 sec

sundrip.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sundrip.com homepage info - get ready to check SUNDRIP best content right away, or after learning these important things about sundrip.com

Art for life

Visit sundrip.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sundrip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 477 ms and then it took 27.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

sundrip.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sundrip.com

477 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

236 ms

css

157 ms

style.css

229 ms

genericons.css

348 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Sundrip.com, 10% (11 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Graph.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) relates to the external source Static.technorati.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 513.2 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

607.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Sundrip.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 491.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 63.4 kB

  • Original 79.6 kB
  • After minification 76.9 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 392.2 kB
  • After minification 388.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SUNDRIP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 342.2 kB

  • Original 491.1 kB
  • After minification 456.7 kB
  • After compression 148.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 103.9 kB

  • Original 157.6 kB
  • After minification 146.7 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sundrip.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 103.9 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (50%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SUNDRIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sundrip.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

sundrip.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sundrip.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sundrip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sundrip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SUNDRIP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: