4 sec in total
103 ms
3.7 sec
178 ms
Welcome to sweetsign.com homepage info - get ready to check Sweetsign best content right away, or after learning these important things about sweetsign.com
At Sweet Sign Systems you can create your own exterior signs for your business if you live in Jamesburg, Trenton, Freehold, Elizabeth and Morristown.
Visit sweetsign.comWe analyzed Sweetsign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sweetsign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value3,710 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
103 ms
156 ms
43 ms
59 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Sweetsign.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sweetsign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 104.3 kB (6%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sweetsign.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sweetsign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)
34
22
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sweetsign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sweetsign.com
103 ms
sweetsign.com
156 ms
css
43 ms
css
59 ms
css
63 ms
css
63 ms
jquery.min.js
51 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
33 ms
scripts.js
33 ms
api.js
104 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1465 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
2456 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1465 ms
wp-embed.min.js
104 ms
jquery.slides.min.js
105 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
71 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
bg-top.png
41 ms
bg-bottom.png
65 ms
logo.png
105 ms
facebook.png
105 ms
1.jpg
128 ms
2.jpg
158 ms
3.jpg
258 ms
4.jpg
257 ms
5.jpg
299 ms
6.jpg
259 ms
7.jpg
258 ms
homebox-bg.png
259 ms
homebox1.jpg
262 ms
read-more.png
266 ms
homebox2.jpg
289 ms
homebox3.jpg
295 ms
homebox4.jpg
317 ms
homebox5.jpg
324 ms
homebox6.jpg
324 ms
recaptcha__en.js
63 ms
collect
16 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
64 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
70 ms
helvetica.woff
1388 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
72 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
73 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
71 ms
js
105 ms
helvetica.ttf
1008 ms
helvetica.svg
894 ms
sweetsign.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
sweetsign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sweetsign.com SEO score
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sweetsign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sweetsign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sweetsign.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sweetsign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: