3.7 sec in total
368 ms
2.5 sec
754 ms
Click here to check amazing Swift Print content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about swiftprint.net
Our emphasis at Swift Print has always been on providing the best value for our customers. We invite you to try us the next time your company needs printing. Feel free to stop by or call us at 540-774...
Visit swiftprint.netWe analyzed Swiftprint.net page load time and found that the first response time was 368 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
swiftprint.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value1,680 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.379
27/100
15%
Value12.7 s
14/100
10%
368 ms
737 ms
471 ms
404 ms
406 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Swiftprint.net, 5% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Swiftprint.net.
Page size can be reduced by 545.7 kB (35%)
1.5 MB
999.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Swiftprint.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 776.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Swift Print images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 307.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 190.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swiftprint.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 190.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (68%)
76
24
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swift Print. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
swiftprint.net
368 ms
www.swiftprint.net
737 ms
font-awesome.min.css
471 ms
common.css
404 ms
dock.css
406 ms
boxy.andy.css
456 ms
jquery-ui.css
561 ms
prettyPhoto.css
461 ms
css
563 ms
modernizr.custom.78688.js
543 ms
jquery.js
697 ms
jquery-migrate.js
553 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
812 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
527 ms
jquery.scrollIntoView.min.js
549 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
550 ms
markup.min.js
551 ms
xml2jso.js
540 ms
common.js
678 ms
jquery.boxy.andy.js
678 ms
menu.js
675 ms
ajax.js
673 ms
evt.js
673 ms
Geometry.js
774 ms
drag.js
781 ms
moreInfo.js
779 ms
float.js
783 ms
HTMLParse.js
782 ms
scroll_tools.js
781 ms
progress.js
784 ms
pf.js
888 ms
common.css
890 ms
nav.css
904 ms
site_footer.css
906 ms
ecommerce_common.css
926 ms
1ecommerce.css
924 ms
site_footer.js
921 ms
bootstrap.min.css
512 ms
css
638 ms
6d79dcb6d4.js
754 ms
owl.carousel.css
922 ms
owl.theme.css
922 ms
meanmenu.min.css
923 ms
theme-choose-print.css
1000 ms
responsive.css
1002 ms
responsive-content.css
993 ms
bootstrap.min.js
507 ms
592620258.js
605 ms
responsive-wisnet.css
949 ms
bootstrap-tabcollapse.js
642 ms
jquery.meanmenu.min.js
631 ms
owl.carousel.js
591 ms
forms.js
581 ms
6d79dcb6d4.css
47 ms
logo8304-173x94.png
36 ms
printing.jpg
36 ms
services.jpg
36 ms
ideas.jpg
38 ms
help-center.jpg
37 ms
home.jpg
38 ms
contact.jpg
37 ms
facebook.png
37 ms
twitter.png
37 ms
stream.jpg
38 ms
SignattheMountain2_002__1593x437_6_220.jpg
39 ms
trees.jpg
37 ms
font-awesome-css.min.css
15 ms
common_print.css
131 ms
our-products_56.png
119 ms
customer-service_32.png
119 ms
SP_REVISEDHOURS.png
122 ms
OnlinePay_Icon_001.jpg
122 ms
print_icon_48.png
121 ms
LightningSwift_CalloutBox.jpg
125 ms
EMBRACE-4X3-FGE_R.png
125 ms
start_64.png
138 ms
grow_64.png
138 ms
build_64.png
136 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
58 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
6 ms
swiftprint.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
swiftprint.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
swiftprint.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swiftprint.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Swiftprint.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
swiftprint.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Swift Print. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: