Tools & Wizards About Us
swifttool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

swifttool.com

MACHINING SUPPLY | Swift Tool | United States

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

68 ms

swifttool.com screenshot

About Website

Visit swifttool.com now to see the best up-to-date Swift Tool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about swifttool.com

Endmills, drills, reamers, and much more in stock! Swift Tool is your local supplier of cutting tools for the machining industry. Services include reginding, tools sharpening, PVD coating, and laser m...

Visit swifttool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Swifttool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

swifttool.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.swifttool.com

47 ms

minified.js

26 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

69 ms

polyfill.min.js

73 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Swifttool.com, 40% (21 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (16 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (536 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 411.1 kB (43%)

Content Size

963.0 kB

After Optimization

552.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Swifttool.com main page is 963.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 519.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 388.9 kB

  • Original 519.2 kB
  • After minification 517.4 kB
  • After compression 130.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 388.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 194.9 kB
  • After minification 176.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Swift Tool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 249.0 kB
  • After minification 248.9 kB
  • After compression 244.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (23%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swift Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.swifttool.com

www.swifttool.com

47 ms

minified.js

minified.js

26 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

69 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

73 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

140 ms

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

143 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

58 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

140 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

140 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

143 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

142 ms

American%20flag%20waving_edited.jpg

American%20flag%20waving_edited.jpg

272 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

62 ms

Swift-Tool-Original-transparent-PNG.png

Swift-Tool-Original-transparent-PNG.png

46 ms

107088_64e6b4f779b844da89286f163f6d44da~mv2.png

107088_64e6b4f779b844da89286f163f6d44da~mv2.png

244 ms

107088_be117812855b47308431fd349177a728~mv2.gif

107088_be117812855b47308431fd349177a728~mv2.gif

134 ms

107088_c25dcb10f3b54b94bd6a16a0d5a5cb44.png

107088_c25dcb10f3b54b94bd6a16a0d5a5cb44.png

242 ms

107088_56594b861ea94a4e85fcc2786162fdd7.jpg

107088_56594b861ea94a4e85fcc2786162fdd7.jpg

316 ms

107088_263a436a655f480e8a4b3e3dacd5f774~mv2.png

107088_263a436a655f480e8a4b3e3dacd5f774~mv2.png

260 ms

107088_91b85df84377416ea52d9de53e90905e~mv2.png

107088_91b85df84377416ea52d9de53e90905e~mv2.png

350 ms

107088_0d9bd6e9682a4ac98d9fcd236cb8c907~mv2.png

107088_0d9bd6e9682a4ac98d9fcd236cb8c907~mv2.png

480 ms

107088_5c7438cfd65646efbab1deb9c2355fad~mv2.png

107088_5c7438cfd65646efbab1deb9c2355fad~mv2.png

246 ms

107088_4399865e46564ddba9239da73f9e8151~mv2.png

107088_4399865e46564ddba9239da73f9e8151~mv2.png

248 ms

107088_eccaf2a9883f4bea99bb6f935654b0e2~mv2.png

107088_eccaf2a9883f4bea99bb6f935654b0e2~mv2.png

413 ms

107088_f63078cc6e2149e9818774827d0d1ff5~mv2.png

107088_f63078cc6e2149e9818774827d0d1ff5~mv2.png

469 ms

107088_8c9eb4a9112046babe428891a210fde4~mv2.jpg

107088_8c9eb4a9112046babe428891a210fde4~mv2.jpg

493 ms

107088_8fa66481cc4e4cbab00282b30292a995.png

107088_8fa66481cc4e4cbab00282b30292a995.png

516 ms

107088_f42a0d4ec3b340e68513b15d14f80021.png

107088_f42a0d4ec3b340e68513b15d14f80021.png

536 ms

116 ms

109 ms

105 ms

106 ms

103 ms

96 ms

144 ms

141 ms

143 ms

158 ms

138 ms

135 ms

20323430-24f4-4767-9d4d-060d1e89758a.woff

20323430-24f4-4767-9d4d-060d1e89758a.woff

8 ms

94e45703-fbd7-46e5-9fcd-228ae59d6266.woff

94e45703-fbd7-46e5-9fcd-228ae59d6266.woff

12 ms

9ee00678-b6d7-4b4f-8448-70cfa267d36b.woff

9ee00678-b6d7-4b4f-8448-70cfa267d36b.woff

8 ms

ae844b11-5158-4caf-90b4-7ace49ac3440.woff

ae844b11-5158-4caf-90b4-7ace49ac3440.woff

8 ms

d3bbaa1b-d5e3-431f-93a7-9cea63601bb6.woff

d3bbaa1b-d5e3-431f-93a7-9cea63601bb6.woff

23 ms

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

7 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

29 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

25 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

swifttool.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

swifttool.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

swifttool.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swifttool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Swifttool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

swifttool.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Swift Tool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: