Tools & Wizards About Us
swiftwrite.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

swiftwrite.com

Top Quality Writing Agency | SwiftWrite

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

191 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

583 ms

swiftwrite.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Swift Write content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about swiftwrite.com

We are a Full Service Content Writing Agency that Specializes in Writing Plagiarism Free Articles, SEO Optimized Blogs and Web Content.

Visit swiftwrite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Swiftwrite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

swiftwrite.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,980 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.933

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

swiftwrite.com

191 ms

www.swiftwrite.com

515 ms

css

46 ms

style-lib.css

260 ms

style.css

447 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Swiftwrite.com, 23% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Swiftwrite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 222.0 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Swiftwrite.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 954.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 148.1 kB

  • Original 169.9 kB
  • After minification 149.3 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 954.6 kB
  • After minification 922.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Swift Write images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 338.2 kB
  • After minification 338.2 kB
  • After compression 302.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 52.2 kB
  • After minification 52.2 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swiftwrite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (52%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swift Write. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

swiftwrite.com

swiftwrite.com

191 ms

www.swiftwrite.com

www.swiftwrite.com

515 ms

css

css

46 ms

style-lib.css

style-lib.css

260 ms

style.css

style.css

447 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

js

js

82 ms

js

js

142 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

23 ms

xlib.js

xlib.js

255 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

230 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

229 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

32 ms

CustomerCookie.js

CustomerCookie.js

234 ms

script.js

script.js

460 ms

jcr-widget.js

jcr-widget.js

85 ms

calIcon.png

calIcon.png

377 ms

cross.png

cross.png

377 ms

logo-popup.png

logo-popup.png

376 ms

call-round.png

call-round.png

375 ms

hotjar-1174893.js

hotjar-1174893.js

211 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

367 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

367 ms

blog-articles.jpg

blog-articles.jpg

585 ms

business-writing.jpg

business-writing.jpg

592 ms

seo-writing.jpg

seo-writing.jpg

577 ms

ban-bot-sec.jpg

ban-bot-sec.jpg

644 ms

orangebg.jpg

orangebg.jpg

577 ms

direction-bg.png

direction-bg.png

847 ms

banner-btn-icon-white.png

banner-btn-icon-white.png

799 ms

howitwork-imgbg.png

howitwork-imgbg.png

859 ms

coma.png

coma.png

804 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

98 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

236 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

273 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

272 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

273 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

1052 ms

popupbg.png

popupbg.png

750 ms

ipinfo.io

ipinfo.io

242 ms

default

default

333 ms

section-why-wait-form.php

section-why-wait-form.php

919 ms

countrylist.xml

countrylist.xml

717 ms

flags.png

flags.png

349 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

58 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

52 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

57 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

133 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

62 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

141 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

60 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

79 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

71 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

78 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

78 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

132 ms

Accessibility Review

swiftwrite.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

swiftwrite.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

swiftwrite.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swiftwrite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Swiftwrite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

swiftwrite.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Swift Write. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: