9.3 sec in total
414 ms
8.1 sec
758 ms
Click here to check amazing Syprus Window content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sypruswindow.in
Visit sypruswindow.inWe analyzed Sypruswindow.in page load time and found that the first response time was 414 ms and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sypruswindow.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
414 ms
3711 ms
223 ms
432 ms
609 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Sypruswindow.in, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Sypruswindow.in.
Page size can be reduced by 195.2 kB (10%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Sypruswindow.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 143.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Syprus Window images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 297 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 502 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sypruswindow.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (71%)
73
21
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Syprus Window. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sypruswindow.in
414 ms
sypruswindow.in
3711 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
223 ms
post-546.css
432 ms
post-669.css
609 ms
frontend.min.css
626 ms
css
33 ms
ekiticons.css
630 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
634 ms
swiper.min.css
637 ms
post-442.css
636 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
816 ms
all.min.css
834 ms
v4-shims.min.css
839 ms
post-540.css
843 ms
widget-styles.css
1066 ms
responsive.css
854 ms
modern.css
1018 ms
css
36 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1043 ms
solid.min.css
1049 ms
regular.min.css
1053 ms
brands.min.css
1081 ms
jquery.min.js
1426 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1252 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1259 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
1266 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
1271 ms
e-gallery.min.css
1277 ms
animations.min.css
1523 ms
frontend.min.js
1534 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1535 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1535 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1707 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1626 ms
main.js
1665 ms
frontend-script.js
1675 ms
widget-scripts.js
1946 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1688 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1829 ms
e-gallery.min.js
1659 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1465 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1301 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1309 ms
hooks.min.js
1407 ms
i18n.min.js
1456 ms
frontend.min.js
1466 ms
waypoints.min.js
1477 ms
core.min.js
1352 ms
frontend.min.js
1330 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1405 ms
animate-circle.min.js
1456 ms
elementor.js
1458 ms
underscore.min.js
1307 ms
wp-util.min.js
1334 ms
frontend.min.js
1332 ms
interior_logo_page-0001-removebg-preview.png
981 ms
1-5.jpg
1246 ms
Beauty-and-Design_HomePageBanner-1349x604-1.jpg
1886 ms
Delivering-Excellence_HomePageBanner-1349x604-1.jpg
1685 ms
3-5.jpg
1332 ms
Untitled-design-22.png
1131 ms
productImg1.webp
1182 ms
productImg2.webp
1343 ms
productImg3.webp
1316 ms
glass-img-1024x576.jpg
1592 ms
glass-railing-500x500-1.webp
1471 ms
Laminated-Float.jpg
1699 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf
16 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf
26 ms
elementskit.woff
2324 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
42 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
51 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
51 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
52 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
52 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
51 ms
eicons.woff
1802 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1669 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1685 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1973 ms
360_F_4909395_valdpGPSy0jxk2nQlMba14M6X207Ta5E.jpg
1822 ms
spider-glazing-500x500-1.webp
1726 ms
ss-railing-gate-1000x1000-1.webp
1695 ms
DocScanner-May-26-2023-17-53.pdf-400-%C3%97-600-px-1.png
1757 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-05-at-12.jpg
1852 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-17-at-12.33.12.jpeg
1839 ms
DocScanner-May-26-2023-17-53.pdf.png
2024 ms
sypruswindow.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sypruswindow.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sypruswindow.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sypruswindow.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sypruswindow.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sypruswindow.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Syprus Window. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: