1.9 sec in total
115 ms
1.5 sec
328 ms
Visit systematicreviewsjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date Systematic Reviews Journal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about systematicreviewsjournal.com
With over 2.9 million article accesses in 2021 alone, Systematic Reviews is one of the world’s leading journals in applied methodology. We publish evidence ...
Visit systematicreviewsjournal.comWe analyzed Systematicreviewsjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
systematicreviewsjournal.com performance score
115 ms
296 ms
70 ms
41 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Systematicreviewsjournal.com, 22% (14 requests) were made to Systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com and 21% (13 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (585 ms) relates to the external source Resource-cms.springer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 580.4 kB (23%)
2.5 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Systematicreviewsjournal.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Systematic Reviews Journal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 496.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 496.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Systematicreviewsjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (36%)
56
36
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Systematic Reviews Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.systematicreviewsjournal.com
115 ms
systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com
296 ms
css
70 ms
suis-biomedcentral.86d30a9e.css
41 ms
webtrekk_v4.min.js
254 ms
oscar.bd472c3f.js
50 ms
mathjaxConfig.698a06c9.js
33 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
v3
585 ms
widgets.js
46 ms
v1
570 ms
v3
444 ms
v1
268 ms
biomed-central-logo_180x35.aea55d8f.png
39 ms
links-aqua-f6f9f9.87f3eaef.jpg
38 ms
springer-logo_75x20.7763bac1.png
38 ms
9CC.js
38 ms
aC6.js
152 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
169 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
170 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
187 ms
realMedia
131 ms
realMedia
129 ms
realMedia
145 ms
MathJax.js
130 ms
collect
95 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
72 ms
collect
74 ms
Oregon_LDO_Book.woff
340 ms
1489633423@Middle
207 ms
1218224480@Top
209 ms
1393246860@Right1
192 ms
TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML.js
36 ms
syndication
97 ms
408277804585730048
196 ms
empty.gif
84 ms
1403777466
80 ms
proxy.jpg
35 ms
proxy.jpg
32 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
8 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
11 ms
1403777466
76 ms
c3a843d7b9a5ff599c503ec5a84b67be_normal.jpeg
152 ms
e58b3e1509eb8e89d7adb26239fa8bb4_normal.jpeg
178 ms
7Rk1liLJ_normal.jpg
213 ms
9QRBWUca_normal.jpg
246 ms
FJfRqnlc_normal.jpeg
272 ms
Ww7HsUA__normal.jpeg
274 ms
O4O0IBnA_normal.jpg
278 ms
zyXUg6sb_normal.jpg
281 ms
bc7090a89d939c4196202bb880e758b8_normal.jpeg
278 ms
Cd2V70SW4AARpti.jpg:large
280 ms
Cd1RWKGW8AA93qw.jpg:large
331 ms
CdrogroWEAAZbtp.jpg:large
351 ms
Cdrax_tWEAEChWa.jpg
335 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
44 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
56 ms
suis-biomedcentral-print.201cf5fb.css
25 ms
usersnap
146 ms
proxy.jpg
13 ms
proxy.jpg
10 ms
handshake.js
181 ms
jot.html
2 ms
systematicreviewsjournal.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Systematicreviewsjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Systematicreviewsjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
systematicreviewsjournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Systematic Reviews Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: