Tools & Wizards About Us
wound.smith-nephew.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

wound.smith-nephew.com

Smith+Nephew Medical Devices and Advanced Wound Care | Smith+Nephew - Corporate

Page Load Speed

964 ms in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

616 ms

Page Rendered

259 ms

wound.smith-nephew.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wound Smith Nephew content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wound.smith-nephew.com

Smith+Nephew is a global portfolio medical technology business. We design and make technology that takes the limits off living.

Visit wound.smith-nephew.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wound.smith-nephew.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 875 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wound.smith-nephew.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

wound.smith-nephew.com

89 ms

ga.js

15 ms

global.css

158 ms

style.css

178 ms

font-awesome.min.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Wound.smith-nephew.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) belongs to the original domain Wound.smith-nephew.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 620.0 kB (64%)

Content Size

967.1 kB

After Optimization

347.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wound.smith-nephew.com main page is 967.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 387.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 31.0 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

  • Original 206.4 kB
  • After minification 177.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wound Smith Nephew needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 241.7 kB

  • Original 342.1 kB
  • After minification 255.0 kB
  • After compression 100.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 325.2 kB

  • Original 387.6 kB
  • After minification 305.2 kB
  • After compression 62.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wound.smith-nephew.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (55%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wound Smith Nephew. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wound.smith-nephew.com

wound.smith-nephew.com

89 ms

ga.js

ga.js

15 ms

global.css

global.css

158 ms

style.css

style.css

178 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

21 ms

style_cip_reset.css

style_cip_reset.css

140 ms

microsite.css

microsite.css

123 ms

mobile.css

mobile.css

152 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

196 ms

corporate.css

corporate.css

182 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

174 ms

scriptresource.axd

scriptresource.axd

193 ms

scriptresource.axd

scriptresource.axd

192 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

142 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

182 ms

hammer.min.js

hammer.min.js

191 ms

jquery.caroufredsel-6.2.1-packed.js

jquery.caroufredsel-6.2.1-packed.js

323 ms

custom.js

custom.js

321 ms

fc.js

fc.js

190 ms

functions.js

functions.js

328 ms

jquery.matchheight.js

jquery.matchheight.js

325 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

326 ms

jpecrga.skin.css

jpecrga.skin.css

324 ms

jpecrga-3.0.0-db.js

jpecrga-3.0.0-db.js

326 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

217 ms

logo-smith-nephew-global.jpg

logo-smith-nephew-global.jpg

210 ms

global-images-banner%20images-redapt_revision_acetabular_cup_conceloc_banner_700.jpg

global-images-banner%20images-redapt_revision_acetabular_cup_conceloc_banner_700.jpg

211 ms

polarstem_700_banner.jpg

polarstem_700_banner.jpg

210 ms

nasastent_banner.jpg

nasastent_banner.jpg

214 ms

bluebelt-logo.png

bluebelt-logo.png

210 ms

thumb_suturefix_ultra.jpg

thumb_suturefix_ultra.jpg

212 ms

allevyn_life_81x65.jpg

allevyn_life_81x65.jpg

214 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

138 ms

fa-search.png

fa-search.png

84 ms

arrow-grey-right-2.png

arrow-grey-right-2.png

80 ms

arrow-grey-right.png

arrow-grey-right.png

80 ms

arrow-grey-right-s.png

arrow-grey-right-s.png

80 ms

nav-div.gif

nav-div.gif

78 ms

snrglf__.woff

snrglf__.woff

114 ms

snbdlf__.woff

snbdlf__.woff

115 ms

68 ms

form-select.png

form-select.png

22 ms

print.css

print.css

9 ms

dotWhite.png

dotWhite.png

11 ms

dotGrey.png

dotGrey.png

9 ms

SEO Factors

wound.smith-nephew.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wound.smith-nephew.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wound.smith-nephew.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wound.smith-nephew.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wound Smith Nephew. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: