4.5 sec in total
1.6 sec
2.7 sec
189 ms
Click here to check amazing 2016 Typodarium content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2016.typodarium.de
Visit 2016.typodarium.deWe analyzed 2016.typodarium.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
2016.typodarium.de performance score
1587 ms
101 ms
197 ms
195 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to 2016.typodarium.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain 2016.typodarium.de.
Page size can be reduced by 162.9 kB (54%)
299.8 kB
136.9 kB
In fact, the total size of 2016.typodarium.de main page is 299.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 92.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2016 Typodarium images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2016.typodarium.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (78%)
23
5
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2016 Typodarium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2016.typodarium.de
1587 ms
node.css
101 ms
defaults.css
197 ms
system.css
195 ms
system-menus.css
196 ms
user.css
197 ms
content-module.css
199 ms
ctools.css
199 ms
date.css
294 ms
filefield.css
290 ms
lightbox.css
292 ms
panels.css
293 ms
views.css
299 ms
default.css
297 ms
style.css
480 ms
tabs.css
388 ms
jquery.js
484 ms
drupal.js
390 ms
lightbox.js
590 ms
panels.js
396 ms
fade.jpg
101 ms
basic_logo.png
99 ms
typodarium2013.jpg
386 ms
print.css
101 ms
2016.typodarium.de SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2016.typodarium.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2016.typodarium.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2016.typodarium.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2016 Typodarium. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: