1.1 sec in total
137 ms
839 ms
112 ms
Click here to check amazing Bustracker Tulsatransit content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bustracker.tulsatransit.org
Visit bustracker.tulsatransit.orgWe analyzed Bustracker.tulsatransit.org page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 951 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
bustracker.tulsatransit.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
137 ms
143 ms
44 ms
180 ms
87 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Bustracker.tulsatransit.org, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (421 ms) belongs to the original domain Bustracker.tulsatransit.org.
Page size can be reduced by 741.5 kB (76%)
974.2 kB
232.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Bustracker.tulsatransit.org main page is 974.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 643.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bustracker Tulsatransit needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 490.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 490.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bustracker.tulsatransit.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 227.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (69%)
32
10
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bustracker Tulsatransit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bustracker.tulsatransit.org
137 ms
vendor.min.css
143 ms
css
44 ms
main.min.css
180 ms
custom.css
87 ms
X42Qimq6FUg194h9WMEHHA.js
59 ms
js
90 ms
vendor.min.js
322 ms
template.js
85 ms
route.js
119 ms
vehicle.js
238 ms
map_Twitter.js
235 ms
map_Routes.js
238 ms
map_Vehicles.js
238 ms
map_Estimates.js
236 ms
variables.js
235 ms
map_Template.js
317 ms
map_GoogleAnalytics.js
317 ms
main.js
406 ms
utilities.js
318 ms
vehicle_marker.js
317 ms
stop_marker.js
419 ms
map_Favorites.js
421 ms
custom_marker.js
420 ms
custom.js
421 ms
liveMapIcons.png
192 ms
clientLogo.jpg
205 ms
comment.png
207 ms
rideSystemsLogo.png
252 ms
clientLogo.jpg
205 ms
loadingIcon.gif
253 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
59 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
59 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
60 ms
GetMapConfig
57 ms
track.js
159 ms
bustracker.tulsatransit.org accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
bustracker.tulsatransit.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
bustracker.tulsatransit.org SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bustracker.tulsatransit.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bustracker.tulsatransit.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bustracker.tulsatransit.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bustracker Tulsatransit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: