1.6 sec in total
259 ms
1.2 sec
138 ms
Visit feedback.thomascook.com now to see the best up-to-date Feedback Thomas Cook content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about feedback.thomascook.com
Book your next holiday at Thomas Cook – cheap deals with deposits from £39pp. Find your perfect package holiday deal with ATOL protection. Don't Just Book it. Thomas Cook it.
Visit feedback.thomascook.comWe analyzed Feedback.thomascook.com page load time and found that the first response time was 259 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
feedback.thomascook.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.082
94/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
259 ms
229 ms
309 ms
235 ms
234 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Feedback.thomascook.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Es.optimost.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.thomascook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (387 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedback.thomascook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 398.4 kB (65%)
614.2 kB
215.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Feedback.thomascook.com main page is 614.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 264.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Feedback Thomas Cook needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 191.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 191.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 139.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedback.thomascook.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 139.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (46%)
35
19
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedback Thomas Cook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
feedback.thomascook.com
259 ms
stylesheet.css
229 ms
jquery-1.6.4.min.js
309 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
235 ms
style.css
234 ms
optimiseHomepage.css
232 ms
optimost_Header.js
238 ms
WebResource.axd
308 ms
WebResource.axd
344 ms
endHomePage.min.js
387 ms
optimost_Footer.js
343 ms
thomasCookLive.js
142 ms
thomasCookAuthorLive.js
20 ms
tc_printLogo.jpg
303 ms
logo.png
167 ms
tripadvisor_logo_132x24-12418-0.gif
183 ms
british-travel-awards-best-family-company.jpg
300 ms
transparent_pixel-12418-2.gif
109 ms
letsGoSprite.png
77 ms
activeTab.jpg
165 ms
blue_loader_image.gif
164 ms
logoTC.png
81 ms
lock.png
165 ms
globe-winner.jpg
316 ms
loader.gif
152 ms
icn-arrow-14px.png
153 ms
spriteAssociations.png
368 ms
spriteCardTypes.png
295 ms
session.js
109 ms
JavascriptInsert.js
109 ms
vms.js
245 ms
;ord=1;num=9239231077954.174
95 ms
fbds.js
3 ms
x24505r8542365
6 ms
28 ms
tap.php
7 ms
2 ms
bc.pv
249 ms
feedback.thomascook.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
feedback.thomascook.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
feedback.thomascook.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedback.thomascook.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedback.thomascook.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feedback.thomascook.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Feedback Thomas Cook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: