867 ms in total
26 ms
700 ms
141 ms
Visit lite.textmarks.com now to see the best up-to-date Lite Text Marks content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lite.textmarks.com
SMS Text Messages by TextMarks | Shared short code text messaging provider | Free trial available | API Gateway, send group text alerts, broadcast SMS, and more.
Visit lite.textmarks.comWe analyzed Lite.textmarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 841 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
lite.textmarks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value2.2 s
94/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
26 ms
103 ms
24 ms
53 ms
104 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Lite.textmarks.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) belongs to the original domain Lite.textmarks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 141.8 kB (65%)
219.3 kB
77.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lite.textmarks.com main page is 219.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 136.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lite Text Marks needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 67% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lite.textmarks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (50%)
26
13
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lite Text Marks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
26 ms
103 ms
TextMarks-Main.css
24 ms
Ax_WebUI.js
53 ms
mbox.js
104 ms
ga.js
53 ms
Background.gif
49 ms
LogoForHeader-For-Solid-BG-See-LogoOnBlue-gif.gif
50 ms
TaglineForWeb.gif
49 ms
NavbarBottomBack.gif
104 ms
TabHome-Off.gif
99 ms
TabDevelopers-Off.gif
95 ms
TabHelp-Off.gif
120 ms
PageBodyBottomBack.gif
125 ms
ContentBoxCornerTopLeft.gif
125 ms
Trans1x1.gif
120 ms
ContentBoxCornerTopRight.gif
119 ms
ContentBoxBottomBack_01.gif
124 ms
BtnLogin.gif
136 ms
ContentBoxBottomBack_02.gif
135 ms
ContentBoxCornerBottomLeft.gif
137 ms
ContentBoxCornerBottomRight.gif
138 ms
SepHorizTile.gif
143 ms
BtnGetStarted.gif
142 ms
Facebook-234x60-001.png
313 ms
Twitter-234x60-001.png
207 ms
t.js
56 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
lite.textmarks.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
lite.textmarks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
lite.textmarks.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lite.textmarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lite.textmarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lite.textmarks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lite Text Marks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: