14.5 sec in total
4.6 sec
8.3 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Taste Media Group content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tastemediagroup.com
Providing Chicago and worldwide clients with digital strategy solutions, video production, motion animation, and livestreaming services.
Visit tastemediagroup.comWe analyzed Tastemediagroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.6 sec and then it took 9.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
tastemediagroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.2 s
0/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value23.1 s
0/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.244
51/100
15%
Value17.9 s
4/100
10%
4599 ms
75 ms
149 ms
252 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Tastemediagroup.com, 16% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Tastemediagroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 162.1 kB (6%)
2.5 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Tastemediagroup.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Taste Media Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 303 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tastemediagroup.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (76%)
71
17
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Taste Media Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tastemediagroup.com
4599 ms
style.css
75 ms
style.min.css
149 ms
3218fa3.css
252 ms
jet-popup-frontend.css
207 ms
ec93c50.css
198 ms
jet-elements.css
262 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
190 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
226 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
276 ms
font-awesome.min.css
280 ms
frontend.min.css
341 ms
post-487.css
296 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
334 ms
jet-tabs-frontend.css
347 ms
flatpickr.min.css
350 ms
post-146.css
360 ms
post-373.css
364 ms
post-382.css
416 ms
post-218.css
415 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
420 ms
brands.min.css
413 ms
jquery.min.js
499 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
436 ms
webfont.min.js
494 ms
utils.min.js
488 ms
js
64 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
485 ms
dashicons.min.css
579 ms
display-opinions-light.css
511 ms
font-awesome.min.css
580 ms
animations.min.css
636 ms
script.js
637 ms
underscore.min.js
636 ms
frontend.min.js
637 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
691 ms
url-polyfill.min.js
691 ms
backbone.min.js
690 ms
front-end-deps.js
628 ms
front-end.js
550 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
626 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
618 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
609 ms
frontend.min.js
590 ms
waypoints.min.js
557 ms
core.min.js
551 ms
frontend.min.js
617 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
616 ms
jet-elements.min.js
620 ms
anime.min.js
577 ms
jet-popup-frontend.js
555 ms
jet-tabs-frontend.min.js
546 ms
wp-util.min.js
614 ms
frontend.min.js
621 ms
flatpickr.min.js
611 ms
css
54 ms
393576525_2241285046066122_250669686956301180_n.jpg
498 ms
393512743_254256220534309_8069907234051590218_n.jpg
451 ms
tmg-logo.v2@2x.png
393 ms
we-are-communications.v2.jpg
520 ms
play-button.v2.png
437 ms
videos.jpg
459 ms
play-button.png
479 ms
home-team-backgroud.v3.jpg
479 ms
our-team.v2.png
704 ms
video-services-callout.jpg
663 ms
motion-services-callout.jpg
585 ms
livestreaming-services-callout.jpg
666 ms
394138466_228594280223216_6318581664478999988_n.jpg
667 ms
393993466_1064788444530057_3782215756466920449_n.jpg
582 ms
tmg-logo-white.png
556 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiS2sdUmj.ttf
113 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1ECSysdUmj.ttf
228 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1E1yysdUmj.ttf
241 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiSysdUmj.ttf
240 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EuyysdUmj.ttf
243 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EVyusdUmj.ttf
243 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EbiusdUmj.ttf
243 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1ECSusdUmj.ttf
243 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EICusdUmj.ttf
243 ms
LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN9JG4S11zY.ttf
55 ms
LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG4S11zY.ttf
77 ms
LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG4S11zY.ttf
77 ms
LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_JHIS11zY.ttf
77 ms
LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_wHIS11zY.ttf
77 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
455 ms
jupiterx.woff
436 ms
tastemediagroup.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
tastemediagroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tastemediagroup.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tastemediagroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tastemediagroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tastemediagroup.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Taste Media Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: