Tools & Wizards About Us
team4bim.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

team4bim.com

BIM modeling / Architectural drafting services

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

770 ms

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

150 ms

team4bim.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to team4bim.com homepage info - get ready to check Team4 BIM best content right away, or after learning these important things about team4bim.com

BIM drafting | Archicad freelancers & Revit BIM drafting services. BIM Building, MEP system modeling from 2D drawings, point clouds or survey information.

Visit team4bim.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Team4bim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 770 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

team4bim.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.12

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.team4bim.com

770 ms

style.min.css

244 ms

style.min.css

458 ms

style.min.css

349 ms

style.min.css

472 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Team4bim.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (988 ms) belongs to the original domain Team4bim.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Team4bim.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 138.7 kB

  • Original 168.7 kB
  • After minification 162.6 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Team4 BIM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 923 B

  • Original 85.5 kB
  • After minification 85.5 kB
  • After compression 84.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (57%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Team4 BIM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.team4bim.com

www.team4bim.com

770 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

244 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

458 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

349 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

472 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

361 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

368 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

369 ms

extendify-utilities.css

extendify-utilities.css

487 ms

style.css

style.css

615 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

495 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

579 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

596 ms

animate.css

animate.css

592 ms

styles.css

styles.css

612 ms

rpt_style.min.css

rpt_style.min.css

619 ms

css

css

131 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

580 ms

trigger_buttons.css

trigger_buttons.css

598 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

601 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

621 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

626 ms

ngg_basic_slideshow.css

ngg_basic_slideshow.css

623 ms

slick.css

slick.css

698 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

719 ms

styles.css

styles.css

721 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

860 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

745 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

751 ms

pointCloud9.jpg

pointCloud9.jpg

365 ms

Parallel-View.jpg

Parallel-View.jpg

567 ms

Little-Black-Hall.jpg

Little-Black-Hall.jpg

358 ms

E9FBAECB-C101-4047-B86F-17C147582FDA.jpeg

E9FBAECB-C101-4047-B86F-17C147582FDA.jpeg

453 ms

Render-sample-12-1.jpg

Render-sample-12-1.jpg

986 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

484 ms

SitePlan1.jpg

SitePlan1.jpg

987 ms

1-view-FINAL-1.jpg

1-view-FINAL-1.jpg

988 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

22 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

37 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

524 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

936 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

936 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

938 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

936 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

937 ms

HTx3L3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B6xHT3w.ttf

HTx3L3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B6xHT3w.ttf

50 ms

HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4-Lwz3bWvA.ttf

HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4-Lwz3bWvA.ttf

56 ms

HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B47rxz3bWvA.ttf

HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B47rxz3bWvA.ttf

58 ms

HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4873z3bWvA.ttf

HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4873z3bWvA.ttf

57 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

56 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

56 ms

logo-optimized.png

logo-optimized.png

934 ms

Collage3-474x342.jpg

Collage3-474x342.jpg

934 ms

MCM-House3-474x342.jpg

MCM-House3-474x342.jpg

934 ms

7-474x342.png

7-474x342.png

934 ms

Kent-Contemporary-Architect-Tim-Ball-optimized1.jpg

Kent-Contemporary-Architect-Tim-Ball-optimized1.jpg

935 ms

pat-121x150.jpg

pat-121x150.jpg

935 ms

1961ce4_21a60791250c78f5e958f6a58ab279dfoptimized.jpg

1961ce4_21a60791250c78f5e958f6a58ab279dfoptimized.jpg

936 ms

Red1.jpg

Red1.jpg

936 ms

Eric-Bobrow_optimized.jpg

Eric-Bobrow_optimized.jpg

937 ms

charles.jpg

charles.jpg

938 ms

embed

embed

207 ms

js

js

30 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

3 ms

search.js

search.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

team4bim.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

team4bim.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

team4bim.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Team4bim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Team4bim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

team4bim.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Team4 BIM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: