4.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
3 sec
436 ms
Click here to check amazing Techfact content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about techfact.org
TechFact is a European group edited Blog, we provide long analysis and quick short articles about technology, covering the European and world Tech start-ups and
Visit techfact.orgWe analyzed Techfact.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
techfact.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.071
96/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
1115 ms
82 ms
135 ms
145 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Techfact.org, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Techfact.org.
Page size can be reduced by 316.3 kB (32%)
981.8 kB
665.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Techfact.org main page is 981.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 625.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Techfact images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 145.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Techfact.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)
34
22
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Techfact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
techfact.org
1115 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
82 ms
style.css
135 ms
responsive.css
145 ms
css
29 ms
reset.css
146 ms
bootstrap.css
220 ms
jquery.js
252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
138 ms
jqcycle.min.js
184 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
199 ms
tinynav.js
191 ms
customscript.js
194 ms
bootstrap.js
301 ms
wp-embed.min.js
307 ms
border.png
195 ms
facebook.png
193 ms
twitter.png
195 ms
youtube.png
195 ms
logotechfact.png
197 ms
r_facebook.png
196 ms
r_twitter.png
196 ms
r_youtube.png
198 ms
postbg.png
198 ms
distribution-human-bot-traffic.jpg
235 ms
readmore.png
198 ms
tumblr_inline_nodwcw3t6T1rw5akg_540.jpg
1353 ms
hoolipreview_display.png
1343 ms
Brain_power.jpg
1345 ms
terminator_24661.jpg
1281 ms
75183565_16f6fd94e5_z.jpg
1472 ms
mash-pano_25700.jpg
1283 ms
The-enemy-is-bullshit.png
1428 ms
ot3.png
1628 ms
rss.png
1417 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
10 ms
-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff
10 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
18 ms
techfact.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
techfact.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
techfact.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techfact.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Techfact.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
techfact.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Techfact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: