5.2 sec in total
1.9 sec
3.1 sec
180 ms
Click here to check amazing Technical Call content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about technicalcall.com
The domain name TechnicalCall.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit technicalcall.comWe analyzed Technicalcall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
technicalcall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.2 s
72/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.05
99/100
15%
Value6.7 s
57/100
10%
1941 ms
81 ms
97 ms
189 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Technicalcall.com, 21% (17 requests) were made to Cdn.datatables.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Technicalcall.com.
Page size can be reduced by 645.2 kB (65%)
998.3 kB
353.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Technicalcall.com main page is 998.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 694.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 783 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technical Call images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 458.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 458.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 158.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technicalcall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 158.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (85%)
79
12
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technical Call. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
technicalcall.com
1941 ms
css
81 ms
css
97 ms
style.css
189 ms
style.css
139 ms
dashicons.min.css
261 ms
desktop_style.css
138 ms
styles.css
139 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.css
85 ms
buttons.dataTables.min.css
89 ms
select.dataTables.min.css
88 ms
fixedHeader.dataTables.min.css
90 ms
fixedColumns.dataTables.min.css
90 ms
responsive.dataTables.min.css
100 ms
style.css
139 ms
superfish.css
211 ms
sequence.css
211 ms
flexslider.css
210 ms
genericons.css
261 ms
jetpack.css
342 ms
jquery.js
480 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
259 ms
front_end_script.js
258 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
66 ms
dataTables.buttons.min.js
85 ms
buttons.colVis.min.js
96 ms
buttons.print.min.js
89 ms
pdfmake.min.js
65 ms
vfs_fonts.js
74 ms
jszip.min.js
63 ms
buttons.html5.min.js
78 ms
dataTables.select.min.js
85 ms
dataTables.fixedHeader.min.js
86 ms
dataTables.fixedColumns.min.js
89 ms
dataTables.responsive.min.js
87 ms
igsv-datatables.js
311 ms
jsapi
67 ms
igsv-gvizcharts.js
314 ms
comment-reply.min.js
314 ms
photon.js
315 ms
jquery.form.min.js
371 ms
scripts.js
375 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
57 ms
gprofiles.js
87 ms
wpgroho.js
374 ms
superfish.js
375 ms
sequence.jquery-min.js
393 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
430 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
433 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
434 ms
theme_trust.js
434 ms
wp-embed.min.js
454 ms
postmessage.js
578 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
578 ms
jquery.inview.js
578 ms
queuehandler.js
578 ms
sharing.js
578 ms
e-201611.js
52 ms
ga.js
23 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
392 ms
15 ms
ui+en.css
3 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,gauge+en,corechart+en.I.js
17 ms
logo-2-300x167.png
220 ms
cs-wh-3d-234x16.gif
211 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMcBaWKZ57bY3RXgXH6dOjZ0.ttf
23 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
23 ms
master.html
125 ms
datatables-en-US.json
63 ms
hovercard.css
44 ms
services.css
150 ms
count.json
36 ms
g.gif
10 ms
graph.facebook.com
139 ms
jquery.js
6 ms
g.gif
6 ms
g.gif
19 ms
sort_both.png
75 ms
sort_asc.png
12 ms
postmessage.js
10 ms
jed.js
20 ms
underscore.min.js
20 ms
technicalcall.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
technicalcall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
technicalcall.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technicalcall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Technicalcall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
technicalcall.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Technical Call. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: