3.8 sec in total
341 ms
3 sec
375 ms
Welcome to technologyblogging.com homepage info - get ready to check Technologyblogging best content right away, or after learning these important things about technologyblogging.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit technologyblogging.comWe analyzed Technologyblogging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
technologyblogging.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value2,800 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value21.9 s
1/100
10%
341 ms
223 ms
122 ms
96 ms
121 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Technologyblogging.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 794.8 kB (63%)
1.3 MB
471.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Technologyblogging.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 901.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Technologyblogging needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 585.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 585.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technologyblogging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (73%)
88
24
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technologyblogging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
technologyblogging.com
341 ms
monetate.js
223 ms
application.css
122 ms
ng-modal.css
96 ms
angular.min.js
121 ms
ng-modal.js
95 ms
google_analytics.js
95 ms
google_oauth.js
94 ms
bold_chat.js
104 ms
eloqua.js
103 ms
hotjar.js
104 ms
adroll.js
102 ms
impactRadius.js
111 ms
in.js
123 ms
api.js
138 ms
api:client.js
163 ms
app.js
106 ms
cookies.js
103 ms
socialMedia.js
103 ms
countryDropdown.js
113 ms
monetate.js
113 ms
index.js
105 ms
lander.js
104 ms
seoPages.js
104 ms
sitePages.js
102 ms
search.js
106 ms
modal.js
100 ms
forms.js
100 ms
tldSelector.js
77 ms
setFixedTop.js
77 ms
searchBar.js
76 ms
currency.js
84 ms
trust.js
76 ms
conversion.js
66 ms
tdfs-inner.css
78 ms
tdfs-temp.css
78 ms
thankyou.css
82 ms
entry.js
9 ms
custom.js
29 ms
css
45 ms
fontawesome.min.css
28 ms
bd-icons.min.css
30 ms
ga.js
279 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
277 ms
userspace
377 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
377 ms
recaptcha__en.js
759 ms
all.js
259 ms
749 ms
logo-header-2x.png
349 ms
1636922804-0
654 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
533 ms
467 ms
hotjar-10205.js
146 ms
elqCfg.min.js
143 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
106 ms
bg-select.png
107 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
107 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
385 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
513 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
583 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
575 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
360 ms
__utm.gif
261 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
137 ms
framework
210 ms
svrGP
341 ms
svrGP
338 ms
postmessageRelay
346 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
288 ms
519 ms
__utm.gif
225 ms
__utm.gif
292 ms
xd_arbiter.php
202 ms
xd_arbiter.php
327 ms
1636922804-1
214 ms
200 ms
collect
313 ms
iframe
216 ms
anchor
195 ms
__utm.gif
95 ms
svrGP.aspx
87 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
274 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
114 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
260 ms
styles__ltr.css
58 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
119 ms
webworker.js
114 ms
logo_48.png
111 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
214 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
228 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
34 ms
recaptcha__en.js
14 ms
iframerpc
27 ms
vms.js
128 ms
roundtrip.js
12 ms
xd_arbiter.php
34 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
157 ms
bc.pv
80 ms
technologyblogging.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
technologyblogging.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
technologyblogging.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technologyblogging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Technologyblogging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
technologyblogging.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Technologyblogging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: