2.4 sec in total
48 ms
1.1 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Technology Board content for Cameroon. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about technologyboard.com
Get paid to answer online opinion surveys. Help evaluate new products, test new advertising, and tell companies what you think. Join for free.
Visit technologyboard.comWe analyzed Technologyboard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
technologyboard.com performance score
48 ms
70 ms
56 ms
84 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Technologyboard.com, 88% (42 requests) were made to D3a2sxc91gk7je.cloudfront.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (538 ms) relates to the external source D3a2sxc91gk7je.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 32.2 kB (14%)
226.4 kB
194.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Technologyboard.com main page is 226.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 117.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Technology Board needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 168 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 85 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technologyboard.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (48%)
44
23
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technology Board. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
technologyboard.com
48 ms
technologyboard.com
70 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
56 ms
jquery.scrollTo-min.js
84 ms
jquery.infinitecarousel.js
367 ms
superfish.js
538 ms
hoverIntent.js
110 ms
jquery.validate.pack.js
111 ms
date_picker.js
109 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.12.custom.min.js
111 ms
jquery.maskedinput-1.3.js
112 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
331 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.12.custom.css
331 ms
reset.css
337 ms
main.css
124 ms
color.css
134 ms
superfish.css
142 ms
default.css
161 ms
script.js
177 ms
ga.js
132 ms
ambitios_header_tile_left.gif
177 ms
ambitios_header_tile_right.gif
144 ms
ambitios_row_tile_left.gif
187 ms
ambitios_row_tile_right.gif
179 ms
ambitios_header_bg.png
145 ms
Blue_Logo.png
144 ms
Tag_Line.png
185 ms
ACOPIndexPic9a_border_1.gif
183 ms
ACOPIndexPic9a_border2.gif
188 ms
ACOPIndexPic9a_border3.gif
184 ms
twitter.png
179 ms
ambitios_first_row_bg.png
101 ms
ambitios_shape_carousel.png
122 ms
ambitios_title_bg_tile.gif
97 ms
ambitios_shape.png
100 ms
ambitios_row_top_g.gif
112 ms
ambitios_arrow_top.gif
98 ms
ambitios_button3_bgs1.png
101 ms
ambitios_button3_bgs3.png
101 ms
ambitios_button3_bgs2.png
112 ms
ambitios_menu_bgactive_right.png
121 ms
ambitios_menu_bgactive_left.png
155 ms
ambitios_menu_bgactive_tile.gif
112 ms
ambitios_dot_act.png
113 ms
ambitios_dot.png
113 ms
__utm.gif
77 ms
collect
53 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
technologyboard.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technologyboard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Technologyboard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
technologyboard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Technology Board. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: