16.3 sec in total
2.3 sec
13.1 sec
962 ms
Click here to check amazing Tech Zenon content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about techzenon.com
Provides innovative Digital Marketing, Website Development, Software and Mobile App Solutions to help your brand achieve the success.
Visit techzenon.comWe analyzed Techzenon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 14 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
techzenon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.5 s
0/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.05
99/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
2286 ms
449 ms
683 ms
688 ms
699 ms
Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Techzenon.com, 8% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Techzenon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 311.3 kB (9%)
3.4 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Techzenon.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 246.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 246.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tech Zenon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Techzenon.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (90%)
101
10
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tech Zenon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.techzenon.com
2286 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
449 ms
wpapp-styles.css
683 ms
simplelightbox.min.css
688 ms
powerfolio_css.css
699 ms
pwrgrids_css.css
709 ms
all.css
150 ms
style.min.css
720 ms
classic-themes.min.css
725 ms
style.min.css
917 ms
theme.min.css
916 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
933 ms
post-5.css
943 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
959 ms
swiper.min.css
966 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1145 ms
global.css
1153 ms
post-16.css
1166 ms
post-11.css
1179 ms
post-151.css
1198 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
1207 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1375 ms
solid.min.css
1388 ms
regular.min.css
1399 ms
brands.min.css
1413 ms
lodash.min.js
1918 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1449 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1605 ms
react.min.js
1624 ms
react-dom.min.js
2335 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1648 ms
hooks.min.js
1691 ms
i18n.min.js
1833 ms
a11y.min.js
1859 ms
url.min.js
1885 ms
api-fetch.min.js
1934 ms
blob.min.js
2062 ms
js
67 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1890 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
1679 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
1480 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
1496 ms
animations.min.css
1598 ms
autop.min.js
1628 ms
block-serialization-default-parser.min.js
1641 ms
deprecated.min.js
1678 ms
dom.min.js
1507 ms
escape-html.min.js
1609 ms
element.min.js
1637 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
1629 ms
keycodes.min.js
1639 ms
priority-queue.min.js
1675 ms
compose.min.js
1764 ms
redux-routine.min.js
1602 ms
data.min.js
1638 ms
html-entities.min.js
1628 ms
shortcode.min.js
1635 ms
blocks.min.js
2396 ms
moment.min.js
1837 ms
date.min.js
2129 ms
primitives.min.js
1644 ms
rich-text.min.js
1653 ms
warning.min.js
1701 ms
components.min.js
2387 ms
keyboard-shortcuts.min.js
1683 ms
notices.min.js
1743 ms
style-engine.min.js
1752 ms
token-list.min.js
1709 ms
wordcount.min.js
1775 ms
block-editor.min.js
3165 ms
server-side-render.min.js
1815 ms
index.js
1845 ms
jquery.min.js
2023 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1780 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1859 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
2094 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
1942 ms
simple-lightbox.min.js
1921 ms
custom-portfolio-lightbox.js
1895 ms
custom-portfolio.js
1984 ms
pwrgrids-custom-js.js
2003 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
2050 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
2043 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1967 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1997 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2035 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2087 ms
frontend.min.js
2062 ms
waypoints.min.js
1974 ms
core.min.js
2004 ms
frontend.min.js
2418 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
2085 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
2027 ms
Banner-design-5.1-copy.jpg
1177 ms
Background.jpg
4105 ms
Background-min.jpg
1915 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
41 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
70 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
117 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
117 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
120 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
485 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
98 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
938 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
180 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
467 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
198 ms
eicons.woff
1163 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
117 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf
117 ms
S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf
117 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
119 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf
119 ms
Logo.jpg
929 ms
Google.png
1154 ms
iso.png
1392 ms
google-rating.png
1248 ms
clutch.png
1365 ms
techzenon.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
techzenon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
techzenon.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techzenon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Techzenon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
techzenon.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tech Zenon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: